ArticleGlobal mental health (Cambridge, England)2026
Recognition of depression by nurses in primary healthcare in Zimbabwe: Cross-sectional study.
Article in Global mental health (Cambridge, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Depression is underrecognized in primary care, which is a barrier to treatment. For the last decade, Zimbabwe has invested in increasing access to depression treatment within primary healthcare. This study describes depression recognition by nurses and referral to treatment in four primary care clinics in Zimbabwe. Research staff screened 200 patients after they attended a primary care visit at a study clinic. They assessed depression using the PHQ-9 and assessed depression and/or anxiety using the Shona Symptoms Questionnaire (SSQ-14). Medical records were examined for depression and/or anxiety diagnoses. Positive depression and anxiety screens were compared with nurse documentation. 69.5% of participants were women and 56.5% were living with HIV. 6.0% had a PHQ-9 score ≥11, indicative of depression, and 22.0% had an SSQ score ≥9, indicative of depression and/or anxiety. None of the patients who screened positive for probable depression and/or anxiety were recognized by nurses. Nurses who saw the patients in the sample were surveyed. Most had not received formal training on mental health in primary care (mhGAP) prior to patient data collection. Despite efforts to expand depression treatment in Zimbabwe, individuals with probable depression were unrecognized by nurses, though nurses offered some care for other mental health conditions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.