Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769467›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Tilapia Skin in Burn Injuries: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Current Management, and Therapeutic Applications.

Mateusz Szot, Mikolaj Zakrys, Katarzyna Zakrys, Szymon Stupnicki, Aleksandra Oparcik, Jakub Tarczykowski, Natalia Kwasniewska, Mieszko Czaplinski

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Mateusz SzotGeneral Practice, Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Poznaniu, Poznań, POL.
Mikolaj ZakrysGeneral Practice, Provincial Hospital, Poznan, POL.
Katarzyna ZakrysGeneral Practice, Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Poznaniu, Poznań, POL.
Szymon StupnickiGeneral Practice, Wojewódzki Szpital Wielospecjalistyczny im. Dr. Jana Jonstona w Lesznie, Leszno, POL.
Aleksandra OparcikGeneral Practice, Centrum Medyczne HCP, Poznań, POL.
Jakub TarczykowskiGeneral Practice, Uniwersytecki Szpital Kliniczny w Poznaniu, Poznań, POL.
Natalia KwasniewskaGeneral Practice, Wojskowy Instytut Medyczny - Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Warsaw, POL.
Mieszko CzaplinskiGeneral Practice, Uniwersyteckie Centrum Klinicznym w Gdańsku, Gdańsk, POL.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Burn wounds are common worldwide and often require prolonged treatment and recovery time. Such injuries are associated with local and systemic changes, both of which require effective action to prevent deterioration and improve long-term outcomes. The most common division of burns is based on injury depth. Treatment differs depending on the extent of the injury. The social and financial burden of burns is heavy, with some survivors being excluded from society. Due to high treatment costs and restricted availability of some management options, patients in low-resource settings may not receive the most advanced care. Therefore, new cost-effective and easily accessible management options are desired to improve clinical outcomes and provide an alternative to traditional methods. Nile tilapia skin showed promising results in burn wound treatment in preclinical and clinical studies. Unique antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and molecular properties of tilapia skin, combined with a structure similar to human cutis, are associated with enhanced wound healing and faster re-epithelialization. In animals, tilapia skin showed promising results in wound healing of various depths. In humans, superficial partial-thickness burns were mostly examined. In comparison to conservative management, patients treated with tilapia skin experienced lower pain intensity, required fewer dressing changes, and decreased analgesic intake. Re-epithelialization was faster. Advantages over traditional methods include a lack of local adverse reactions, low infection risk, reduced pain, cost-effectiveness, ease in tilapia skin acquisition, and application. Clinical studies restricted to a small number of participants and a lack of research on humans in various burn depths limit the broader employment of tilapia skin. Data on long-term outcomes are scarce; therefore, more studies need to be performed in that area to create clear guidelines and standardized treatment protocols. However, the beneficial effects of tilapia skin on wound healing are very promising and have high potential for development. In the future, it might become a cornerstone of burn injury treatment and improve clinical outcomes, particularly in low-resource settings.

Indexed as

better outcomesburn wound managementcost-effectiveness of wound carenovel treatmentreconstructive plastic surgerytilapia skinwound healing and tissue repair

Identifiers

PMID41769467
PMCPMC12949593

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.