ReviewCureus2026
Tilapia Skin in Burn Injuries: A Narrative Review of Pathophysiology, Current Management, and Therapeutic Applications.
Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Burn wounds are common worldwide and often require prolonged treatment and recovery time. Such injuries are associated with local and systemic changes, both of which require effective action to prevent deterioration and improve long-term outcomes. The most common division of burns is based on injury depth. Treatment differs depending on the extent of the injury. The social and financial burden of burns is heavy, with some survivors being excluded from society. Due to high treatment costs and restricted availability of some management options, patients in low-resource settings may not receive the most advanced care. Therefore, new cost-effective and easily accessible management options are desired to improve clinical outcomes and provide an alternative to traditional methods. Nile tilapia skin showed promising results in burn wound treatment in preclinical and clinical studies. Unique antimicrobial, anti-inflammatory, and molecular properties of tilapia skin, combined with a structure similar to human cutis, are associated with enhanced wound healing and faster re-epithelialization. In animals, tilapia skin showed promising results in wound healing of various depths. In humans, superficial partial-thickness burns were mostly examined. In comparison to conservative management, patients treated with tilapia skin experienced lower pain intensity, required fewer dressing changes, and decreased analgesic intake. Re-epithelialization was faster. Advantages over traditional methods include a lack of local adverse reactions, low infection risk, reduced pain, cost-effectiveness, ease in tilapia skin acquisition, and application. Clinical studies restricted to a small number of participants and a lack of research on humans in various burn depths limit the broader employment of tilapia skin. Data on long-term outcomes are scarce; therefore, more studies need to be performed in that area to create clear guidelines and standardized treatment protocols. However, the beneficial effects of tilapia skin on wound healing are very promising and have high potential for development. In the future, it might become a cornerstone of burn injury treatment and improve clinical outcomes, particularly in low-resource settings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.