Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769629›Full record

ReviewCureus2026

Legal Aspects of Pediatric Dentistry in India: A Narrative Review.

Laresh N Mistry, Saba Kondkari, Sumeet Agarwal, Himmat Jaiswal, Sindhu P Pulaskar, Sayem A Mulla

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Laresh N MistryPedodontics and Preventive Dentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Saba KondkariDentistry, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Sumeet AgarwalProsthodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Himmat JaiswalConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Sindhu P PulaskarConservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Bharati Vidyapeeth (Deemed to be University) Dental College and Hospital, Navi Mumbai, IND.
Sayem A MullaDentistry, Dentist and Independent Researcher, Kalyan, IND.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The interface between pediatric dentistry and law in India is increasingly significant as dental practitioners face expanding medico-legal accountability, consumer rights awareness, and evolving digital challenges. This paper critically explores the regulatory frameworks, ethical obligations, and medico-legal considerations that shape pediatric dental practice in India. It highlights statutory obligations under the Dentists Act, 1948, the Clinical Establishments Act, 2010, the Consumer Protection Act, 2019, and the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, 2012, while addressing consent, confidentiality, digital documentation, and forensic responsibilities. The discussion underscores the necessity of preventive legal literacy, meticulous record-keeping, and ethical vigilance to foster legally resilient and patient-centered pediatric oral care.

Indexed as

clinical pediatric dentistryethical practicelegal issuesmedical-legalmedico-legal issues

Identifiers

PMID41769629
PMCPMC12937318

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.