ArticleFrontiers in nutrition2026
The impact and predictive value of refeeding syndrome on the short-term prognosis of patients with severe stroke: a retrospective cohort study.
Article in Frontiers in nutrition, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: Refeeding syndrome (RFS) may have adverse effects on patients. However, the impact of RFS on the prognosis of severe stroke patients remain unclear. This study aims to explore the impact on short-term prognosis of patients with severe stroke. Methods: A total of 305 patients were included for retrospective analysis. The electrolyte changes and short-term prognosis between RFS and Non-RFS (NRFS) groups of patients were compared. Besides, the risk factors for prognosis of patients and the predictive efficacy of RFS in patient prognosis were analyzed. Results: The new acute liver injury (ALI), new acute kidney injury (AKI), new mechanical ventilation (MV), mortality within 28 d, and mRS scores at the discharge were higher in the RFS group than in the NRFS group ( Conclusion: RFS is an independent risk factor for the patient's functional prognosis, therefore, medical staff should screen high-risk populations as early as possible and provide preventive treatment according to the guidelines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.