Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41769922›Full record

ArticleAnnals of African medicine2026

Long-term Surveillance Outcomes of Renal Function in Living Kidney Donors Postlaparoscopic Donor Nephrectomy.

Siddhartha Racheruvu, Sunil Mhaske

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of African medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Siddhartha RacheruvuDepartment of Urology, Dr. D. Y. Patil Medical College, Hospital and Research Centre, Pune, Maharashtra, India.
Sunil Mhaske

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

abstractLaparoscopic donor nephrectomy (LDN) is increasingly performed worldwide; however, long-term data on renal outcomes in living kidney donors remain limited. This case series evaluates renal function trends following LDN at a tertiary care center. A retrospective analysis was conducted on 38 living kidney donors who underwent LDN. Renal function was assessed using serum creatinine, creatinine clearance (CCR) calculated by the Cockcroft-Gault formula, and DTPA renogram findings measured preoperatively, on postoperative day 2 (POD-2), and at the final follow-up. Statistical comparisons were performed using paired t-tests. The mean donor age was 45.2 ± 12.3 years, with 22 male and 16 female donors. Mean serum creatinine increased from 0.89 ± 0.10 mg/dL preoperatively to 1.24 ± 0.21 mg/dL on POD-2 and stabilized at 1.18 ± 0.18 mg/dL at long-term follow-up. Mean CCR declined from 104.6 ± 21.5 mL/min preoperatively to 74.6 ± 14.5 mL/min on POD-2, with partial recovery to 82.0 ± 16.0 mL/min at follow-up. Renal function was preserved in 88.2% of donors on POD-2 and in 90.2% at the final follow-up. These findings indicate that most donors maintain stable renal function following LDN. Creatinine clearance serves as a cost-free and effective parameter for donor evaluation and for tailoring postoperative monitoring and long-term follow-up. Overall, LDN appears to be a safe procedure when appropriate donor selection and structured follow-up are employed.

Indexed as

KidneyKidney TransplantationLaparoscopyLiving DonorsNephrectomyTissue and Organ HarvestingAdultCreatinineFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHumansKidney Function TestsMaleMiddle AgedPostoperative PeriodCreatininecase seriesclairance de la créatininecreatinine clearancedonneur rénalfonction rénalekidney donorslaparoscopic donor nephrectomyNéphrectomie laparoscopique du donneurrenal functionsérie de cas

Identifiers

PMID41769922
PMCPMC13541346

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.