Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41770049›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2026

Tactical use of irrigants in open orthopaedic procedures: 'what to use & when'.

Madhav Chowdhry, Abdul Qayyum Khan, Christopher Hamad, Nicholas M Bernthal, Edward J McPherson

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Madhav ChowdhryDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0769-0326
Abdul Qayyum KhanDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Jawaharlal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.
Christopher HamadDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Nicholas M BernthalDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.
Edward J McPhersonDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, David Geffen School of Medicine, UCLA, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Musculoskeletal infections (MSIs) pose formidable challenges to healthcare resources. Surgical wound irrigation is a crucial step in reducing microbial bioburden in open orthopaedic procedures, yet there remains ambiguity regarding optimal use of lavage agents. For tactical selection of irrigants, orthopaedic wounds can be classified into three major categories (aseptic, acute septic and chronic septic) based upon microbial bioload and presence or absence of biofilm upon implanted hardware and/or musculoskeletal tissues. Irrigant products can be stratified based upon their modes of action: single modal (dilutional), dual modal (dilutional and chemical) and multi-modal (dilutional with multiple mechanisms). Host toxicity is commensurate with increased complexity of an irrigant product. A tailored, stepwise strategy of irrigant selection aligned with wound type is recommended, escalating from simple low toxicity dilutional lavage for low microbial bioloads to potent multi-modal chemical agents for biofilm-laden chronic infections. The method of irrigant delivery and selected volume are integral to wound lavage. The difference between methods is the impact pressure to host tissues and the depth of fluid penetration. Higher impact pressures clear adherent bacteria and foreign debris albeit the cost of host tissue damage.

Indexed as

acute septicasepticbiofilmchronic septicirrigantsorthopaedic lavageorthopaedic woundsplanktonic microbes

Identifiers

PMID41770049
PMCPMC12974731

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.