ReviewPLOS digital health2026
Autism data sharing: Benefits, challenges, and recommendations.
Review in PLOS digital health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Utility of lay and clinical narratives for transparent autism diagnosis using BioBERT deep learning.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- The Innovative Health Initiative public-private partnership: a catalyst for big data-driven health research and innovation.Frontiers in medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data sharing is a key element of scientific research, but it is associated with many complex legal, ethical, and practical challenges. These are particularly salient in autism research, where concerns have been raised about researchers' intentions, research priorities not aligning with those of autistic people, and differing opinions within stakeholder communities as to what priorities should be addressed. This review paper was co-produced through an iterative collaborative process to incorporate diverse viewpoints of stakeholder representatives from academia, charity, industry, the medical community, and the autism community. We discuss the main benefits and challenges of autism data sharing and argue that the perspectives of autistic people must be central to discussions around its ethical and technological aspects. We outline recommendations for ethical and responsible data sharing practices and note key developments within the field, including federated data sharing and community platforms and registries.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.