ArticlePloS one2026
Vaping and mental health: A cross-sectional study among university students in Bangladesh.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionVaping has continued to rise, besides smoking, among youth in Bangladesh in recent years. While there has been evidence of the impact of vaping on physical health, studies focusing on mental health specifically from the South Asian context are almost non-existent. Therefore, this study examines the association between vaping and a spectrum of mental health issues, such as psychological distress, depression, and anxiety, among university students in Bangladesh.
methodsA cross-sectional study with undergraduate students, aged 18-25 years, from seven universities in Bangladesh, was conducted. Data were collected using a web-based questionnaire. Data on smoking, vaping, and dual use were collected. Psychological distress was measured by using the K10 scale, while the CES-D10 and GAD-7 scales assessed depression and anxiety, respectively. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses determined the relevant associations. Adjusted Odds Ratios (AORs) and 95% Confidence Intervals (CIs) were reported.
resultsOf the 1615 study participants, males and females were distributed equally, and 54% were from two private universities. Findings revealed that one in six (15.4%, n = 248) participants were currently vaping. Exclusive current smokers were 6.2%, exclusive vape users were 6.5%, and dual users were 8.9%. Among vape users, the prevalence of psychological distress (80.5% vs. 76.6%) and depression (63.8% vs. 60.8%) was higher among dual users compared to current vape users; anxiety was similar (56.9% vs. 57.6%) in both groups. After adjusting potential confounders, current vaping was associated with drinking alcohol (AOR 11.43, 95% CI 7.41-17.63) and used of recreational drugs (AOR 4.29, 95% CI 2.36-7.79) However, dual use was associated with higher depression (AOR 1.93; 95% CI 1.04-3.57) and without a preexisting mental health condition was associated with severe anxiety (AOR 2.00, 95% CI 1.25-3.20).
conclusionThe study underscores a concerning impact on mental health amongst the young group of the population who were vaping, specifically among the dual users. Besides raising awareness, university-based tobacco cessation support and counselling should be considered a student well-being support strategy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.