Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41770799›Full record

ArticlePLoS computational biology2026

Combining visual motion and luminance features to enhance the detection of small moving objects in a bioinspired model.

Shuai Li, Aike Guo, Yizheng Wang, Liang Li, Gang Wang, Zhihua Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS computational biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shuai LiSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Aike GuoSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.
Yizheng WangBrain Research Center, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Liang LiBrain Research Center, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Gang WangBrain Research Center, Beijing Institute of Basic Medical Sciences, Beijing, China.
Zhihua WuSchool of Life Sciences, Shanghai University, Shanghai, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6761-2007

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flying insects demonstrate exceptional proficiency in detecting and pursuing conspecifics and prey within a cluttered environment, inspiring the development of computational models for small object detection. While existing bioinspired models are dedicated to resolving small moving instead of stationary object detection, few studies have systematically explored the role of visual motion in detection. Here, we developed a fly-inspired model on the basis of the hypothesis that combining visual motion features and luminance features is critical for small moving object detection. We thoroughly investigated the effect of feature combination under diverse stimulus conditions. Simulations indicated that the model exhibited hyperacute object detection, a capability not generally believed to emerge on the basis of motion detection. When tested with a moving background in realistic scenarios, the model demonstrated enhanced efficiency and robustness relative to models relying solely on luminance features. This enhancement was independent of whether visual motion was extracted by two- or three-arm motion detectors. The results suggested that small object detectors within the visual systems of flying insects could be optimally tuned to utilize the limited features inherent to tiny objects.

Indexed as

Models, BiologicalMotion PerceptionAnimalsComputer SimulationDetection AlgorithmsDipteraFlight, AnimalInsectaPhotic Stimulation

Identifiers

PMID41770799
PMCPMC12965699

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.