Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41771887›Full record

ArticleNPJ breast cancer2026

Neoadjuvant pembrolizumab plus chemotherapy in older patients with early-stage triple-negative breast cancer: real-world insights from neo-real/GBECAM-0123.

Mariana Carvalho Gouveia, Romualdo Barroso-Sousa, Laura Lapuchesky, Laura Testa, Monique Celeste Tavares, Flávia Cavalcanti Balint, Carlos Henrique Dos Anjos, Débora de Melo Gagliato, Mayana Lopes de Brito, Giuliana Colucci and 24 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ breast cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

34 authors.

Mariana Carvalho GouveiaClinical Oncology, Américas Oncologia- Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo, Brazil.
Romualdo Barroso-SousaGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Laura LapucheskySUMA (Grupo Cooperativa Argentino para el estudio y la investigación del Cáncer de Mama), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Laura TestaGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Monique Celeste TavaresClinical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Flávia Cavalcanti BalintClinical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Carlos Henrique Dos AnjosGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Débora de Melo GagliatoGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Mayana Lopes de BritoGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Giuliana ColucciSUMA (Grupo Cooperativa Argentino para el estudio y la investigación del Cáncer de Mama), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Daniele Assad-SuzukiGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniela Dornelles RosaGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Noele de Jesus Barros GomesClinical Oncology, DASA Oncologia- Hospital São Domingos, São Luís, Brazil.
Natalia Cristina Cardoso NunesClinical Oncology, Instituto Américas, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
Isadora Martins de SousaClinical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Matheus de Oliveira AndradeClinical Oncology, Américas Oncologia- Hospital Brasília, Brasília, Brazil.
Fernanda MadasiInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Jose BinesGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil.
Mariana SavignanoSUMA (Grupo Cooperativa Argentino para el estudio y la investigación del Cáncer de Mama), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Rafael Dal Ponte FerreiraClinical Oncology, Hospital Moinhos de Vento, Porto Alegre, Brazil.
Candice Lima SantosInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Recife, Brazil.
Maira TavaresInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), Salvador, Brazil.
Mariana Ribeiro MonteiroClinical Oncology, Américas Oncologia - Hospital Samaritano, São Paulo, Brazil.
Zenaide Silva de SouzaClinical Oncology, Hospital Sírio-Libanês, Brasília, Brazil.
Ana Maria Ulbricht GomesClinical Oncology, Hospital Beneficência Portuguesa, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruna M ZucchettiClinical Oncology, Américas Oncologia- Hospital 9 de Julho, São Paulo, Brazil.
Anezka FerrariClinical Oncology, Américas Oncologia - Hospital Santa Paula, São Paulo, Brazil.
Maria Marcela Fernandes MonteiroClinical Oncology, Instituto do Câncer do Ceará, Fortaleza, Brazil.
Poliana Albuquerque SignoriniClinical Oncology, Centro Integrado de Pesquisa da Amazônia (CINPAM), Manaus, Brazil.
Solange SanchesClinical Oncology, A.C.Camargo Cancer Center, São Paulo, Brazil.
Paulo M HoffInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Claudio PalettaSUMA (Grupo Cooperativa Argentino para el estudio y la investigación del Cáncer de Mama), Buenos Aires, Argentina.
Maria Del Pilar Estevez-DizInstituto D'Or de Pesquisa e Ensino (IDOR), São Paulo, Brazil.
Renata Colombo BonadioGrupo Brasileiro de Estudos em Câncer de Mama (GBECAM), São Paulo, Brazil. rrccbonadio@gmail.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The KEYNOTE-522 regimen is the standard of care for stage II-III triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). However, older patients were underrepresented in the pivotal trial. We evaluated the effectiveness and safety of this regimen in patients aged ≥65 years enrolled in the Neo-Real/GBECAM-0123 multicenter real-world study conducted across institutions in Brazil and Argentina. Among 724 patients, 80 (11%) were aged ≥65 years and presented distinct baseline characteristics, including lower frequencies of grade 3 tumors, Ki67 ≥ 50%, and germline BRCA1/2 mutations, alongside a higher prevalence of impaired performance status. The pathologic complete response (pCR) rate in older patients was 54.9% in comparison with 64.5% in younger patients, although age was not independently associated with pCR in multivariable analysis, including other relevant baseline variables. Older patients experienced a significantly higher toxicity burden, with increased rates of treatment discontinuation, dose reductions, treatment delays, hospitalizations, and grade ≥3 neutropenia. Taken together, these data indicate that older patients with TNBC harbor distinct biological and clinical features with numerically lower pCR rates, and that the increased toxicity burden underscores the need for personalized treatment strategies and dedicated research in this population.

Identifiers

PMID41771887
PMCPMC13066152

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.