ArticleScientific reports2026
A multi-task deep learning and radiomics framework for fetal anatomical structure detection and classification in ultrasound imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- SEG-FAUSP: Anatomical Structure Segmentation of the Standard Sections of Fetal Abdominal Ultrasounds.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To develop a comprehensive deep learning and radiomics-based multi-task pipeline for the detection and classification of key fetal anatomical structures in first-trimester ultrasound images, using a diverse multi-center dataset to ensure high variability, reproducibility, and generalizability. A total of 4,532 fetal ultrasound scans (gestational age 11–14 weeks), retrospectively collected from nine medical centers, were included in this study. Two detection models, You Only Look Once version 11 (YOLOv11) and shifted window transformer (Swin Transformer), were trained to localize nine fetal brain and craniofacial structures. From each detected region, 215 radiomic features and 1,792 deep features were extracted. Feature stability was ensured through intra-class correlation coefficient (ICC) filtering (threshold ≥ 0.75), Pearson correlation analysis, and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) regression. The selected features were then used to train a Transformer-based model for tabular data (TabTransformer) to classify fetal anatomical structures into clinically defined categories based on their sonographic appearance. Model performance was evaluated using Accuracy, area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and Sensitivity across training, internal validation, and external test datasets. Fusion models integrating radiomic and deep features consistently outperformed single-modality models in both detection and classification. On the external test set, classification accuracy reached 96.1%, with AUCs up to 96.89%, and sensitivity exceeding 95% for key anatomical structures. Swin Transformer achieved superior localization performance compared to YOLOv11, with Intersection over Union (IoU) values up to 0.97 and F1-scores ≥ 0.94. Feature reproducibility remained above 75% across centers. The TabTransformer classifier demonstrated strong generalization and robustness, effectively leveraging the fused feature space for high-precision classification. This study presents the fully integrated, multi-task framework for fetal anatomical structure detection and classification using multi-center ultrasound data. The proposed approach demonstrates high reproducibility and diagnostic performance, offering strong clinical potential for early and objective fetal anomaly screening in the first trimester.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.