ArticleZeitschrift fur Rheumatologie2026
[Quality management in the rheumatology laboratory].
Article in Zeitschrift fur Rheumatologie, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laboratory diagnostic tests in rheumatology laboratories are subject to the regulations of the German Medical Association, whose guidelines on quality assurance for laboratory medical examinations (Rili-BÄK) are binding. Quality assurance covers the entire process-from sample collection, transport, and distribution to analysis and diagnosis. We present examples of typical procedures in the rheumatology laboratory and discuss key aspects of quality assurance. The laboratory diagnostic procedures used should comprise CE-marked in vitro diagnostic devices. The introduction of tests into the laboratory requires clinical evidence of the validity of the tests. In addition, the procedures must be verified/validated, performed under quality control, and evaluated in a meaningful way. Participation in laboratory comparisons ensures correct implementation. The article concludes with information on professional law and reimbursement issues.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41772162What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.