SynthesisReproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.)2026
Melatonin in Preeclampsia: a Systematic Review of its Role in Pathogenesis and Therapeutic Potential.
Synthesis in Reproductive sciences (Thousand Oaks, Calif.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Preeclampsia (PE) is a hypertensive disorder of pregnancy that contributes substantially to maternal and fetal morbidity and mortality. Because current therapeutic options remain limited, melatonin (ML), with its antioxidant and anti-inflammatory properties has been proposed as a potential adjunct therapy. This review systematically evaluates and meta-analyses the available human and animal evidence on the effects of ML in PE. A systematic search of PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar was conducted up to the end of 2024. Eligible studies included clinical trials evaluating the effect of exogenous ML in PE models. Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two reviewers. A random-effects model was used for meta-analysis. Nine studies were included: one human trial and eight animal studies. The human trial showed that ML (30 mg/day) extended the interval from diagnosis to delivery by 6 days without adverse effects, though proteinuria increased. Animal studies consistently showed that ML reduced oxidative stress and inflammation, while enhancing antioxidant defenses. Meta-analysis of six animal studies showed significant reductions in systolic blood pressure (-17.94 mmHg; 95% CI: -28.35 to -7.52) and proteinuria. ML had no significant effect on fetal weight (mean difference: 0.23 gr; 95% CI: -0.03 to 0.50) but slightly increased placental weight (0.01 gr; 95% CI: 0.00 to 0.03) among preeclamptic animal models. ML may offer limited benefit for maternal PE symptoms, but current evidence for fetal safety and fetal benefit is weak, conflicting, and insufficient for clinical recommendation. Larger human trials are needed to clarify its risk–benefit profile.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41772302What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.