Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41772440›Full record

ArticleBMC primary care2026

Clinician and patient experiences with opportunistic offer of HPV self-testing in Aotearoa New Zealand primary care clinics: interview and survey findings.

Karen Bartholomew, Anna Maxwell, Lily P H Yang, Phyu Sin Aye, Leanne Young, Cleo Neville, Jane Grant, Susan M Sherman, Collette Bromhead, Sue Crengle and 8 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

18 authors.

Karen BartholomewHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-1517-2134
Anna MaxwellHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-4155-0255
Lily P H YangHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0000-6565-1312
Phyu Sin AyeHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9356-9965
Leanne YoungHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand. leanne.young@tewhatuora.govt.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-5350-4443
Cleo NevilleHealth Gain Development, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Q4 Building, Level 2, Smales Farm, 74 Taharoto Road, Takapuna, Auckland, 0622, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0003-6552-9992
Jane GrantChild, Youth and Women, Planning, Funding and Outcomes, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-2365-400X
Susan M ShermanSchool of Psychology, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, England.ORCID 0000-0001-6708-3398
Collette BromheadMolecular Pathology, School of Health Sciences, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-2890-2191
Sue CrengleNgāi Tahi Māori Health Research Unit, University of Otago, Dunedin, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0001-9367-1492
Kate MoodabeTotal Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand.
Georgina McPhersonWomen's Health, Waitematā District, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0003-3550-4746
Nina ScottHauora Māori Services, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Hamilton, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-9481-6400
Deralie FlowerObstetrics and Gynaecology, Te Toka Tumai Auckland District, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0000-0002-8292-8974
Richard MasseyPathology Associates New Zealand, Tauranga, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0006-3835-5909
Jyoti KathuriaWomen's Health, Counties Manukau District, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0005-5406-7416
Pania CooteMāori Monitoring Equity Group (National Screening Programmes), AwhiMai Consultancy, Bluff, New Zealand.
Wendy BurgessWomen's Health, Waitematā District, Health New Zealand | Te Whatu Ora, Auckland, New Zealand.ORCID 0009-0009-5399-2502

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundTo support the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing in the New Zealand National Cervical Screening Programme, we conducted an implementation study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of opportunistically offering HPV self-testing in general practice from both clinician and participant perspectives with a home testing option and centralised follow-up.

methodsPrimary care clinicians trained to offer the HPV self-test were invited to semi-structured interviews exploring their perception of receptivity to the opportunistic offer and challenges and enablers to implementation. Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken on transcripts. Participants (aged 30–69 years) were sent a link to an online survey after HPV result notification. Survey results were analysed using descriptive statistics with an inductive approach to analysis of free text responses. Participant recruitment and data collection occurred between November 2021 and January 2024.

resultsOf the 40 clinicians trained to offer HPV self-testing, 12 primary care clinicians from six ethnically diverse primary care sites in Auckland completed an interview. ‘Positive reception’ was the strongest theme with clinicians reporting that overwhelmingly, participants were receptive to the HPV self-test offer. The four enabler themes were: ‘supportive practice systems’, ‘importance of the discussion’, ‘options for testing' and ‘specialised support and consistency’. Key challenge themes in implementing opportunistic self-testing were ‘competing demands’ and ‘communicating what it’s all about’. Of the 3,524 self-tested participants, 394 responded to the survey. Most (93%) found the amount of information they received about HPV self-testing ‘about right’ and 86% were comfortable in their decision to self-test. Considering their next cervical screening, more respondents preferred home-based self-testing options than self-testing at a clinic (46% versus 37%).

conclusionOffering the HPV self-test opportunistically to people due for screening when they visited their primary care provider for any reason was generally well received and feasible for clinic staff. The option to take kits home for sampling was an enabler of participation. Supportive systems and resources for clinicians will be important if opportunistic HPV self-testing is offered more widely in primary care, including further consideration of a central specialist team to follow-up and support home testing and participants with HPV detected results.

trial registrationThis study did not reach the ICJME or WHO criteria for clinical trial registration.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelHuman Papillomavirus VirusesPapillomavirus InfectionsSelf CareSelf-TestingUterine Cervical NeoplasmsAdultAgedEarly Detection of CancerFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicMaleMiddle AgedNew ZealandPrimary Health CareAt-home testingCervical screeningClinician perspectivesHealth inequityHuman papillomavirus (HPV)Implementation scienceMāori healthPacific healthParticipant perspectivesPrimary careSelf-sampling

Identifiers

PMID41772440
PMCPMC13097904

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.