ArticleBMC primary care2026
Clinician and patient experiences with opportunistic offer of HPV self-testing in Aotearoa New Zealand primary care clinics: interview and survey findings.
Article in BMC primary care, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Trial
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
18 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTo support the introduction of human papillomavirus (HPV) self-testing in the New Zealand National Cervical Screening Programme, we conducted an implementation study aimed to explore the acceptability and feasibility of opportunistically offering HPV self-testing in general practice from both clinician and participant perspectives with a home testing option and centralised follow-up.
methodsPrimary care clinicians trained to offer the HPV self-test were invited to semi-structured interviews exploring their perception of receptivity to the opportunistic offer and challenges and enablers to implementation. Reflexive thematic analysis was undertaken on transcripts. Participants (aged 30–69 years) were sent a link to an online survey after HPV result notification. Survey results were analysed using descriptive statistics with an inductive approach to analysis of free text responses. Participant recruitment and data collection occurred between November 2021 and January 2024.
resultsOf the 40 clinicians trained to offer HPV self-testing, 12 primary care clinicians from six ethnically diverse primary care sites in Auckland completed an interview. ‘Positive reception’ was the strongest theme with clinicians reporting that overwhelmingly, participants were receptive to the HPV self-test offer. The four enabler themes were: ‘supportive practice systems’, ‘importance of the discussion’, ‘options for testing' and ‘specialised support and consistency’. Key challenge themes in implementing opportunistic self-testing were ‘competing demands’ and ‘communicating what it’s all about’. Of the 3,524 self-tested participants, 394 responded to the survey. Most (93%) found the amount of information they received about HPV self-testing ‘about right’ and 86% were comfortable in their decision to self-test. Considering their next cervical screening, more respondents preferred home-based self-testing options than self-testing at a clinic (46% versus 37%).
conclusionOffering the HPV self-test opportunistically to people due for screening when they visited their primary care provider for any reason was generally well received and feasible for clinic staff. The option to take kits home for sampling was an enabler of participation. Supportive systems and resources for clinicians will be important if opportunistic HPV self-testing is offered more widely in primary care, including further consideration of a central specialist team to follow-up and support home testing and participants with HPV detected results.
trial registrationThis study did not reach the ICJME or WHO criteria for clinical trial registration.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.