ArticleHarm reduction journal2026
Characteristics of adverse reactions to kratom and implementation of harm reduction strategies in a sample of ethnobotanical tea bar patrons in Colorado.
Article in Harm reduction journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Kava (Piper methysticum) consumption patterns and conceptualizations: results from an online survey.Substance abuse treatment, prevention, and policy · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundKratom is a psychoactive botanical that is increasingly popular in the United States. While potential risks of kratom use have been identified, research on harm reduction strategies and contextual factors contributing to adverse reactions is limited. Given that kratom is federally unregulated at present, and a variety of kratom products are widely available on the commercial market, more data are needed to inform harm reduction efforts and public health messaging.
methods102 participants (mean age = 22.34 years, 39.2% women) were recruited from ethnobotanical tea bars in Northern Colorado to complete a survey on kratom use, which included questions pertaining to adverse experiences.
resultsMost participants (75.5%) reported experiencing an adverse reaction to kratom at least once in the past, with a wide range of kratom doses reportedly consumed during these experiences. Adverse reactions were most commonly reported to occur in the context of consuming kratom on an empty stomach, consuming alongside certain foods, lack of hydration, and combining kratom with other substances. Participants employed a variety of strategies in attempt to mitigate adverse reactions, such as stopping or pacing their use of kratom and other substances, modulating hydration and food intake, and engaging in rest and recovery behaviors.
conclusionsAdverse reactions to kratom may be associated with certain contextual factors. Several techniques are reportedly used to mitigate adverse reactions, but the efficacy of these techniques is unknown. More data are needed to understand the causes and consequences of adverse reactions to kratom, and to better understand potential harm reduction strategies for reducing adverse experiences. More research could also shed light on the extent to which kratom serving size and various product formulations (e.g. whole leaf vs. extracts) are predictive of adverse effects.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.