ArticleCureus2026
Black Patients Experience Higher Complication Burden and Distinct Valve Selection Patterns in Aortic Valve Replacement.
Article in Cureus, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background Young adults undergoing the Ross procedure for aortic valve replacement may have better outcomes than more conventional mechanical and bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement. This study evaluates racial disparities in access to the Ross procedure and postoperative outcomes, hypothesizing that Black patients may have differing Ross utilization due to constrained valve options, with persistent disparities in postoperative complications. Methods Cases of open aortic valve replacement (AVR) surgery between 2012 and 2021 from the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) were isolated, with all transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) cases excluded. All data was deidentified with IRB exemption. Univariate analysis and propensity score matching with binary logistic regression were performed to assess the independent effect of black self-identified race on access and 30-day post-operative complications. Covariates included in the propensity models included age, gender, BMI, smoking status, as well as comorbidities including diabetes, congestive heart failure, kidney failure, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Results Among 5,698 isolated AVR cases in ACS-NSQIP, most were White patients (93.7%), older (median age 71), and underwent mechanical AVR, with Ross procedures remaining rare at 260 (4.6%) cases. Black patients were less likely to receive mechanical AVR overall, but among those younger than 60, were more likely than White patients to undergo the Ross procedure. Across valve types, Black patients experienced higher rates of postoperative patient complications, including acute renal failure, prolonged mechanical ventilation, reintubation, cardiac arrest and 30-day mortality. An adjusted analysis demonstrated that Black race was an independent predictor of severe postoperative complications regardless of valve strategy. Conclusions Differences in AVR use and outcomes between Black and White patients reflect structural, socioeconomic, and clinical factors rather than biology. Higher Ross use among younger Black patients likely reflects greater comorbidity and limited valve options, while persistently worse outcomes highlight the impact of baseline risk and systemic inequities. Addressing these disparities requires research incorporating socioeconomic and care-delivery factors, alongside clinical strategies such as standardized referrals, preoperative optimization, and equity-focused decision support.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.