ArticleInternational journal of general medicine2026
Knowledge, Practice and Barriers to Exercise Rehabilitation Among Chinese Patients with Acute Musculoskeletal Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study.
Article in International journal of general medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Knowledge, Practice and Barriers to Exercise Rehabilitation Among Chinese Patients with Acute Musculoskeletal Injury: A Mixed-Methods Study [Letter].International journal of general medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to identify the current status and barriers to exercise rehabilitation among Chinese patients with acute musculoskeletal injury. Patients and Methods: This single-center, sequential explanatory mixed-methods evaluation included a quantitative survey and qualitative semi-structured interviews. The quantitative survey was distributed online to patients who had acute musculoskeletal injury within five years. For the qualitative component, patients and their families, as well as physiotherapists, orthopedic surgeons, coaches, and personal trainers were recruited. Interview guides were inductively developed and revised based on data analysis. Thematic analysis was conducted using the Capability, Opportunity, and Motivation Behavior model. Results: Among 284 participants, only 65.1% visited the hospital, 22.9% sought rehabilitation services, and 6.0% completed training after injury. The most common reasons for not going to the hospital (92.9%) or rehabilitation department (70.1%) was underestimation of the injury severity. However, one year after injury, 65.7% still experienced abnormalities at the injury sites, and 46.9% had changed their sport habits. In total, 23 participants were interviewed. Barriers of exercise rehabilitation included patient's lack of knowledge about the requirement of exercise rehabilitation guidance and instruction from orthopedic surgeons, difficulty with mobility and enough time, insufficient number of qualified physiotherapists or clinics, underestimation of injury severity, low expectation of rehabilitation, and cost reasons. Conclusion: This study provides novel evidence on systemic and behavioral barriers to exercise rehabilitation in China, supporting efforts in education for both orthopedic providers and patients, expanding the workforce of qualified specialists, and integrated referral and remote-supervision models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.