ArticleHealth promotion international2026
Why school tobacco bans fail: staff engagement in enforcement in Belgian schools.
Article in Health promotion international, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Tobacco control bans are only as effective as their enforcement, and schools are a critical though often overlooked frontline. School tobacco policies (STPs) frequently fail when staff hesitate to act. This study aimed to measure and explain staff engagement in STP enforcement using a newly developed scale. Staff members (n = 624) from 18 Belgian secondary schools took part in the ADHAirE study. Building on previous qualitative studies, we constructed a 10-item scale to assess staff willingness to enforce the STP. We used exploratory factor analysis (EFA) to identify key attitudinal dimensions underlying the scale and conducted multilevel analyses to assess factors that predict enforcement. Participants scored high on willingness to enforce the rules (2.89, range 1-4). EFA revealed two key attitudinal dimensions, each explaining 20% of the variance: the perception that enforcement is a professional role, which was widely endorsed, and sharedness of rules, for which there was less adherence: only half of the participants felt supported by parents, and 40% believed tobacco control was not a school priority. Notably, enforcement was predicted by the perception that rules are enforced by one's colleagues and the sense that the rules are justified. Bans are likely to be enforced if they are perceived as part of the staff's professional role and are shared among the school community. Effective enforcement of school smoking bans requires a shared commitment that integrates school staff, leadership, and parents. The validated scale offers a tool for school principals or health authorities to assess that alignment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.