ArticleActa dermato-venereologica2026
Catastrophizing in Chronic Itch: Associations with Demographic, Clinical and Psychological Factors.
Article in Acta dermato-venereologica, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Catastrophizing, defined as an overly negative evaluation of one's situation, is associated with worse disease outcomes in patients with chronic pain but remains unexplored in pruritus medicine. In this cross-sectional study, we included patients with chronic prurigo (CPG, n=50), chronic pruritus on nonlesional skin (CPNL, n=50) and chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU, n=50) to investigate catastrophizing and determine possible associations with demographic and clinical factors. Patients completed validated questionnaires assessing catastrophizing (Itch-Cognition-Questionnaire), itch intensity, disease control, quality of life, anxiety, depression, stress and attention to itch. We recorded median [interquartile range] catastrophizing scores of 19.0 [11.0; 29.0] for CPG, 17.0 [11.8; 24.3] for CPNL and 10.0 [5.0; 18.3] for CSU patients. Catastrophizing correlated positively with itch intensity (r=0.382-0.678, p<0.001-0.006), quality of life impairment (r=0.554-0.716, p<0.001) and vigilance and awareness to itch (r=0.407-0.591, p<0.001-0.003) across patient groups. Linear regression analysis revealed a lower likelihood of catastrophizing in CSU patients (CSU: β=-5.905, p<0.001; CPG: reference), a positive association of catastrophizing with average itch intensity (β=1.119, p=0.008) and attention to itch (β=0.150, p<0.001), and a negative association with age (β=-0.095, p=0.004) and short disease duration (β=-5.797, p=0.049). Catastrophizing represents a pivotal cognitive process, which is associated with worse clinical outcomes in chronic itch patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.