ReviewJournal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine2026
Coping experiences in child and adolescent rehabilitation through a novel device: A multi-method feasibility study.
Review in Journal of pediatric rehabilitation medicine, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
PurposeThis study aimed to explore the feasibility and user experience of Grasp, a novel digital tool designed to register coping experiences during paediatric rehabilitation, and to examine perceived impact on reflection and sense of mastery.MethodsChildren and adolescents aged 8-16 years, their parents, and healthcare professionals in paediatric rehabilitation participated. Those participating were instructed to squeeze Grasp when experiencing mastery or coping during activities. Data were visualised and discussed during the end-of-stay summary meeting. A multi-method design was applied, integrating data logs, questionnaires, and semi-structured interviews to capture measurable indicators and in-depth perspectives.ResultsTwenty-three children and adolescents with parents and healthcare professionals were included. Recruitment rate was 100% and retention 96%. All participants used the device and software (median registrations 19, range 4-80). The majority found Grasp easy to use (71%), enjoyable (61%), and motivating (89%). Healthcare professionals reported that data provided valuable insights into children's coping experiences. Interviews identified two main themes: (a) coping registration with Grasp was feasible, and (b) Grasp seemed to facilitate self-efficacy and reflection.ConclusionRegistering coping experiences through Grasp was feasible and well-received in paediatric rehabilitation. For some, it appeared to strengthen reflection and sense of mastery, potentially enhancing self-efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.