ArticleJMIR research protocols2026
Educational Intervention to Improve Sexual Health and Quality of Life in Survivors of Breast and Gynecological Cancer: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Feasibility Study.
Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Sexual health is often underaddressed in cancer care, especially among survivors of breast and gynecological cancer. In Colombia, treatment side effects, cultural stigma, and limited training among health care providers affect well-being. Although international guidelines promote patient-centered and culturally sensitive approaches, few interventions have been implemented in low- and middle-income settings. Objective: This study aimed to describe the feasibility and acceptability of an educational psychosexual intervention for survivors of breast and gynecological cancer, including design, integration of qualitative and quantitative methods, core components, measurement time points, and a prespecified analysis plan. Methods: This is a prospective, single-group feasibility study at a university hospital in Colombia. Participants are adult women who completed treatment for breast or gynecological cancer at least 2 years before enrollment. The intervention combines tiered educational workshops, semistructured group interviews, and optional individualized counseling. Qualitative data will explore perceptions, barriers, and facilitators related to sexual health and well-being. Quantitative outcomes include the Female Sexual Function Index and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 before and after the intervention to estimate change. Pre- and postintervention scores will be compared with paired tests and CIs. Qualitative data will undergo reflexive thematic analysis. Mixed findings will inform feasibility, acceptability, and practical recommendations. The intervention was co-designed with survivors and a multidisciplinary team, refined by expert review and a manual, and pilot-tested to optimize acceptability, logistics, and fidelity. Results: The study was funded in December 2024 and approved by the Comité de Ética en Investigación Biomédica of Fundación Valle del Lili. Recruitment began in March 2025 and is expected to end in September 2025. As of July 2025, 13 participants had enrolled (n=2, 15.4% survivors of breast cancer; n=11, 84.6% survivors of gynecological cancer). Based on pretrial piloting, shorter session blocks and optional hybrid delivery were made available to support adherence while preserving core content and objectives. Final analysis is planned for October 2025, with results expected in December 2025. Conclusions: This protocol evaluates the feasibility and acceptability of a codesigned, context-adapted psychosexual education model. Findings will guide implementation refinements and the design of a future comparative study of effectiveness and longer-term outcomes and may inform sustainable integration of sexual health into survivorship care in low- and middle-income settings. The model is intended to be replicable and scalable across oncology and other chronic disease contexts.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.