ReviewArchives of microbiology2026
Phage therapy for treatment of bacterial vaginosis.
Review in Archives of microbiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
- Erratum issued
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
A common vaginal dysbiosis, bacterial vaginosis (BV), has serious consequences for reproductive health, including an elevated risk of infertility and pelvic inflammatory disease. Its distinctive feature is a robust polymicrobial biofilm, mainly composed of Gardnerella species (spp.), which protects infections against antibiotic therapy and promotes high rates of recurrence. Concurrently, Chlamydia trachomatis (CT) is the most common bacterial sexually transmitted infection globally, with over 130 million new cases annually. A primary cause of tubal factor infertility, CT infection promotes adnexal adhesions and fallopian tube obstruction through inflammatory damage. This article reviewed two critical agents: CT, an intracellular bacterium that causes inflammatory tubal damage, and BV, caused by biofilm-forming pathogens such as Gardnerella. The growth of antimicrobial resistance underscores the critical need for targeted alternatives to broad-spectrum antibiotics. Endolysins, enzymes that break down bacterial cell walls, are produced by bacteriophages (phages) and represent a potential new treatment approach. This paper summarizes evidence that modified endolysins, such as PM-477, can specifically break down Gardnerella biofilms in vitro and ex vivo while preserving beneficial vaginal lactobacilli. We examine how this precise mechanism addresses the fundamental shortcomings of existing BV treatment. Then, to transform phage-derived techniques from an intriguing preclinical concept into a workable therapeutic intervention for recurrent BV, we critically assess the key translational obstacles that must be addressed, including pharmacokinetics, formulation, and the need for clinical trials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41774177What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.