ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Smartwatch assessment of CPR performance administered to an instrumented mannequin.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac arrest is a life-threatening emergency that requires effective cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) to preserve life. Smartwatches equipped with accelerometer sensors and worn close to the wrist joint may offer an accessible way to provide CPR feedback. This study determined whether accelerometer data from a smartwatch could provide valid estimates of CPR parameters, including compression, decompression, frequency, and cycle time. Nineteen medical school students performed CPR on an instrumented mannequin while wearing a smartwatch. CPR parameters were derived from the smartwatch’s accelerometer signals using a custom algorithm after first resampling the data to 60 Hz to circumvent the issue of small fluctuations in the sampling frequency inherent in these devices. Results were compared with kinematic data obtained from video analysis undertaken simultaneously. Across 3,005 CPR cycles, smartwatch analysis indicated that 76.7% of compressions were within the recommended depth range (5–6 ± 0.5 cm), while the mannequin software reported a mean performance score of 98.7 ± 1.35%. There was good agreement between smartwatch and video analysis for cycle duration (bias = 0.00 s; 95% CI: −0.05 to 0.05 s) and compression depth (bias = − 0.31 cm; 95% CI: −1.61 to 0.98 cm). These findings demonstrate that smartwatch accelerometer data analyzed with the proposed algorithm can accurately assess CPR performance administered to a mannequin, supporting its potential use as a practical assessment tool for CPR. Further work is needed to develop a smartwatch App that provides real-time feedback to improve CPR performance during training and real-world resuscitation scenarios.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.