ArticleMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026
Evaluation of the anticancer effects of ellagic acid and cisplatin in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells.
Article in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Potent Therapeutic Insights FromFood science & nutrition · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ellagic acid (EA) is a natural polyphenol noted for its antiproliferative and pro-apoptotic effects. This study investigates the impact of EA, alone or combined with cisplatin (CIS), on the expression of angiogenesis, apoptosis, metastasis, and chemoresistance-related genes and proteins in cisplatin-sensitive and -resistant MDA-MB-231 breast cancer cells. Cell viability was evaluated by cytotoxicity assay, while gene and protein expression levels were analyzed via qPCR and immunocytochemistry. Molecular docking was used to assess EA's binding affinity to target proteins. The IC₅₀ values of EA and CIS were 29 µM and 38.2 µM in cisplatin-sensitive MDA-MB-231 cells, and 49.5 µM and 80.2 µM in cisplatin-resistant cells, respectively. In both cell types, EA significantly decreased the expression of the ABCB1 and VEGF genes, especially at 24 and 48 h. EA alone and combined with CIS suppressed MMP2 and MMP9 expression across both cell types. Additionally, EA and CIS + EA treatments suppressed Bcl-2 expression and upregulated Bax expression. Immunocytochemical results aligned with gene expression data, demonstrating reduced protein levels. Molecular docking demonstrated strong binding of EA to Bax and MMP9. These results indicate that EA exerts notable anticancer activity by targeting genes associated with drug resistance, angiogenesis, apoptosis, and metastasis. The findings highlight EA's therapeutic potential in breast cancer treatment, alone or with CIS. Further detailed in vivo and clinical studies are needed to confirm these promising results.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.