ArticleNature communications2026
Velocity sensitivity of mechanotransduction in the afferent terminal underlies vibration detection in the Pacinian corpuscle.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- An inherited hypomorphic variant in PIEZO2 reveals structural features of mechanotransduction.Neuron · 2026Article
- Exploratory Immunohistochemical Mapping of Mechanosensitivity-Associated Ion Channel Proteins in Terminal Glial Cells of Human Meissner and Pacinian Corpuscles.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Pacinian corpuscles are the principal detectors of high-frequency vibrations in amniotes, enabling environmental awareness, the detection of fine textures, and the manipulation of tools and objects during exploration and foraging. Corpuscles consist of a multilayered outer core enclosing a sensory inner core, which contains lamellar Schwann cells enveloping the afferent terminal at its center. In the traditional model, the outer core acts as a mechanical filter, enabling only high-frequency vibrations to reach the afferent terminal. Here, we show that the afferent terminal, not the outer core, carries out both the frequency filtering and sensory functions. We demonstrate that the detection of high-frequency vibration results from the afferent terminal's sensitivity to stimulus velocity rather than to stimulus cycle rate. Furthermore, these properties are generally independent of the corpuscular environment and instead reflect the biophysical characteristics of the mechanically gated ion channels in the terminal, such as Piezo2. We present a revised model wherein the high-frequency tuning of Pacinian corpuscles is enabled by the velocity sensitivity of mechanotransduction in the afferent terminal.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.