ArticleScientific reports2026
Integrative mendelian randomization approaches for therapeutic target prioritisation in immune-mediated diseases.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Immune-mediated diseases (IMD) encompass a wide range of autoimmune and inflammatory disorders with aetiology related to immune system dysfunction, signifying a disease area with great potential for drug repurposing. In this study, we employed the genetically informed Mendelian Randomization (MR) method with two distinct exposure types: immune blood cell abundance and protein quantitative trait loci (pQTL) to validate and repurpose 834 drug targets which have been investigated for IMD treatment. Utilizing two-sample MR, we first established causal relationships between major peripheral immune cell types and 14 IMD. Robust associations, particularly with eosinophils, were confirmed across diseases such as asthma, eczema, sinusitis, and rheumatoid arthritis, revealing 59 high-confidence relationships. Intragenic variants associated with causal immune cell types were then extracted to create instruments for 371 existing IMD drug targets (“intermediate trait” MR). In parallel, we leveraged four large blood plasma protein QTL datasets to obtain complementary instruments for 361 targets (“pQTL” MR). In the intermediate trait MR analysis, we identified 811 gene-IMD associations (p-value < 0.05; 137 pairs below Bonferroni-adjusted p-value threshold), 169 of which were supported by strong colocalisation evidence (PPH4 ≥ 0.8). In the pQTL MR analysis, we similarly found 841 protein-IMD associations (p-value < 0.05; 90 pairs below Bonferroni-adjusted p-value threshold), 83 of which were confirmed with colocalization. Comparison with a list of approved drugs indicated low sensitivities across disease outcomes for both exposure types (intermediate trait MR: 0.49 ± 0.23 SD, pQTL MR: 0.28 ± 0.12 SD). Drug targets identified in the pQTL and intermediate trait MR analyses show limited overlap (13% at nominal p-value and 36% at Bonferroni-adjusted p-value threshold), presenting a comprehensive source of drug repurposing opportunities when the two approaches are combined.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.