Evidence mapPaperPMID 41775826Full record

Observational studyScientific reports2026

Practices for glucose measurement with a glucometer in a population of diabetic patients. An observational study.

Ewa Kobos, Ewa Kostrzewa-Zabłocka, Anna Ławnik, Beata Hornik

Abstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Ewa KobosDepartment of Development of Nursing, Social and Medical Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, Medical University of Warsaw, 27 Ciołka Street, 01-445, Warsaw, Poland. ewa.kobos@wum.edu.pl.
Ewa Kostrzewa-ZabłockaDiabetes Outpatient Clinic, Independent Public Provincial Specialist Hospital, Chełm, Poland.
Anna ŁawnikDepartment of Nursing, Faculty of Health Science, Pope John Paul II State School of Higher Education, Biała Podlaska, Poland.
Beata HornikDepartment of Internal Nursing, School of Health Sciences in Katowice, Medical University of Silesia, Katowice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The ability to use a glucometer for self-monitoring of blood glucose is an important component of optimal blood glucose control in diabetic patients. However, the importance of this skill is still not well understood by numerous patients and in medical facilities. The aim of this study was to evaluate glucose measurement practices in people with diabetes. A Cross-sectional, descriptive study. This cross-sectional, observational study was conducted in a group of 212 patients who attended follow-up visits in diabetes clinics located in two hospitals with the same level of referral. The criteria for inclusion in the study were: age ≥ 20 years, diabetes diagnosed at least 1 year before the study, glucose monitoring using only a glucometer. The ability to measure glucose with a glucometer was assessed using a 16-item observation questionnaire. The relationship between two variables was calculated using the R Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient. The non-parametric Mann-Whitney U test was used to assess differences of one feature between two groups. The non-parametric Chi-squared test was also used in the analyses. A multiple linear regression model was constructed to examine the associations between of multiple independent variables and single dependent variable. The data showed that 49.1% of the patients were rather able to measure glucose with a glucometer. Over half of them (53.8%) had never participated in training to learn how to measure glucose levels. As regards patients included in the study, we identified 3 errors related to measurement technique in 19.3% of them, while 9 errors defining correct measurement skills were identified in 5.7% of the patients. The most common errors included failure to replace the lancet in the fingertip lancing device (81.6%) and not washing hands with warm soapy water prior to the measurement (65.1%). The number of errors reported during the measurement was significantly related to the age of the patients, education level, professional status, place of residence, self-assessment of the financial situation, type of diabetes and participation in education. Educating patients in the skill of the self-monitoring of blood glucose with a glucometer should constitute an integral part of the care of a diabetic patient in a diabetes clinic. Only one in ten patients with diabetes fully adhered to the principles of correct glucose measurement with a glucometer. When educating patients on how to take measurements, special attention should be paid to replacing lancets in the lancing device and washing hands with soap and water before collecting a blood sample. When assessing the ability to measure glucose levels using a glucometer in this group of patients, the following factors should be considered: glycated hemoglobin concentration, patient participation in education on how to take measurements, self-assessment of the financial situation and the duration of diabetes.

Indexed as

Blood GlucoseBlood Glucose Self-MonitoringDiabetes MellitusAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedBlood GlucoseDiabetesDiabetes outpatient clinicGlucometerSelf-monitoring of blood glucose

Identifiers

PMID41775826
PMCPMC13066093

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.