ArticleScientific reports2026
Deep learning-based basilar artery wall and lumen segmentation from 1-mm MR vessel wall imaging.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
To investigate the morphology of the basilar artery (BA) using 1-mm magnetic resonance (MR) vessel wall imaging (VWI). This retrospective study included 36 patients who underwent intracranial 1-mm MR-VWI. The BA morphology was evaluated following a machine learning paradigm. Twenty patients (1073 cross-sectional BA images) were used to fine-tune a pre-trained deep learning model, Mask-RCNN, for BA segmentation. Six (373 cross-sectional BA images) were used for model validation and 10 (186 axial BA images) for comparison with human expert ratings. Human expert ratings were conducted in radial directions oriented at 3, 6, 9, and 12 o’clock. Agreement between human expert and machine estimation was evaluated using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and statistical significance was estimated by paired student’s t-test. BA wall segmentation was assessed using the intersection-over-union (IOU) metric. The BA exhibits a tapered shape, with the widest diameter at the beginning (3.17 ± 0.69 mm) and significantly narrowing towards the end (2.71 ± 0.55 mm) (p-value < 0.001). The deep-learning model demonstrated moderate to excellent agreement with human expert ratings (ICC: 0.72–0.83) when measuring BA diameter. However, agreement was less optimal (ICC < 0.5) when measuring artery wall thickness. For vessel wall segmentation, the model achieved a mean IOU score of 0.756 ± 0.079. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of using a 1-mm MR-VWI protocol for characterizing and evaluating the vertebrobasilar circulation. This enhanced knowledge of basilar artery shape is critical and should help neurosurgeons safely diagnose and manage posterior circulation diseases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.