ArticleNature communications2026
Machine learning discovers numerous new computational principles supporting elementary motion detection.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Inhibition benefits neural system identification.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Update of
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
Motion direction detection is a fundamental visual computation that transforms spatial luminance patterns into directionally tuned outputs. Classical models of direction selectivity rely on temporal asymmetry, where motion detection arises through either delayed excitation or inhibition. Here, I used biologically inspired machine learning applied to retinal and cortical circuits to uncover receptive field architectures capable of direction selectivity. These include mechanisms based on asymmetric synaptic properties, spatial receptive field variations, new roles for pre- and postsynaptic inhibition, and previously unrecognized kinetic implementations. Conceptually, these circuit architectures cluster into eight computational primitives underlying motion detection, four of which are previously undescribed. Many of the solutions rival or outperform classical models in both robustness and precision, and several exhibit enhanced noise tolerance. All mechanisms are biologically plausible and correspond to known physiological and anatomical motifs, offering fresh insights into motion processing and illustrating how machine learning can uncover general principles of neural computation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.