Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41776195›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2026

Interpretable hybrid ensemble with attention-based fusion and EAOO-GA optimization for lung cancer detection.

Mesfer Al Duhayyim, Murdhy A Aldawsari, Atef Ismail, Marwa M Emam

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Mesfer Al DuhayyimDepartment of Computer Science, College of Computer Engineering and Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Al-Kharj, 16273, Saudi Arabia.
Murdhy A AldawsariNursing Department, College of Applied Medical Sciences, Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University, Wade Aldwaser, Saudi Arabia.
Atef IsmailPhysics Department, Al-Azhar University, Asyut, 71524, Egypt.
Marwa M EmamFaculty of Computers and Information, Minia University, Minia, Egypt. marwa.khalef@mu.edu.eg.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Lung cancer’s high mortality rate underscores the critical need for early and accurate diagnosis, as late-stage diagnoses often lead to 5-year survival rates as low as 5% compared to 56% for early detection, imposing significant economic burdens on healthcare systems and diminishing patient quality of life. While deep learning models offer promising tools for analyzing Computed Tomography (CT) scans, they often suffer from limitations in generalizability, interpretability, and sensitivity to imbalanced data. This paper introduces SE-FusionEAOO Ensemble, a new robust framework for lung cancer classification. Our approach leverages the strengths of multiple deep learning architectures through a sophisticated two-stage process. First, we construct three powerful feature fusion models by strategically pairing diverse pre-trained networks (DenseNet201/EfficientNetB6, Inception v3/MobileNetV2, DenseNet121/ResNet50), each integrated with Squeeze-and-Excitation (SE) blocks for adaptive feature recalibration. Second, we amalgamate the predictions of these expert models using an intelligently weighted aggregation scheme. The key innovation of our framework is the deployment of a new metaheuristic, the Enhanced Animated Oat Optimization algorithm with Genetic Operators (EAOO-GA), to precisely optimize these ensemble weights, ensuring optimal contribution from each model. To address class imbalance in the IQ-OTH/NCCD lung cancer dataset, we employ the Synthetic Minority Over-sampling Technique (SMOTE), significantly improving the model’s sensitivity to minority classes. Extensive experimental results demonstrate that our framework achieves a state-of-the-art accuracy of 99.40%, with 99.2% precision, 99.5% recall, and 99.3% F1-score, outperforming individual models, conventional ensemble methods, and other metaheuristic optimizers. Additionally, the model was externally validated on the LIDC-IDRI dataset, achieving 97.9% accuracy and 97.8% F1-score, confirming its strong generalization capability across independent clinical domains. The proposed framework provides a highly accurate, reliable, and interpretable tool for automated lung cancer detection.

Indexed as

Deep LearningLung NeoplasmsAlgorithmsConvolutional Neural NetworksEnsemble LearningHumansTomography, X-Ray ComputedDeep learningEnsemble learningLung cancerOat optimization algorithmSqueeze-and-Excitation networks

Identifiers

PMID41776195
PMCPMC12960684

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.