ArticleScientific reports2026
Data-driven machine learning modelling in wire EDM of TiNiCo shape memory alloy.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Shape memory alloys (SMAs) are a specific category of smart materials established for their superior mechanical, physical, and biomedical characteristics. SMAs demonstrate two significant behaviours- pseudoplasticity and shape memory effect which produce them highly beneficial for advanced operational uses. To use these materials in real components, they must be accurately machined into precise shapes. In the present study, WEDM was used to machine a Ti₅₀Ni₄₀Co₁₀ shape memory alloy, and key machining performance measures namely surface roughness (SR) and material removal rate (MRR) were evaluated. In addition, the machined surfaces were thoroughly characterized in terms of morphology and topography. While ANN is employed to optimize process parameters such as voltage and for the best possible surface roughness, and MRR. ANN findings showed 0.96 for validation, 0.93 for testing, and 0.97 overall, efficient parameter tuning of Wire EDM variables for the SMA, achieving strong correlation coefficients (R-values) of 0.99 for training. The most suitable verification efficiency is obtained with a MSE (Mean Squared Error) of 0.729 at phase 5, after training completion within 11phase. These findings suggest that the ANN model is reliable and steady for estimating the operating parameters.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.