ArticleScientific reports2026
Integration of circulating tumor DNA data enhances lung cancer prediction in patients with COPD.
Article in Scientific reports, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Lung tumour secretome and extracellular vesicles: mechanisms, biomarkers, and therapeutic opportunities.Cancer metastasis reviews · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) are at increased risk of lung cancer, and the identification of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) mutations may help detect lung cancer in them. However, whether the addition of ctDNA information improves lung cancer prediction remains to be elucidated. Blood samples from 236 patients with COPD (119 with lung cancer and 117 without lung cancer) were genotyped using targeted deep sequencing. With 40 clinical and genomic/molecular variables, nine machine learning (ML) models to predict lung cancer were constructed. Prediction performances were compared between models with clinical variables only and those with additional genomic/molecular variables. Three clinical variables (smoking amount, C-reactive protein [CRP], COPD symptom burden) and four genomic/molecular variables (ctDNA mutation detected, lung cancer driver gene, max variant allele frequency, and median duplex) were significantly associated with lung cancer (P < 0.05). Notably, four of the nine ML models, incorporating clinical and genomic/molecular variables, outperformed models using clinical variables alone (AUC of the best models = 0.729 vs. 0.620, P < 0.05). Integration of ctDNA information may enhance risk stratification strategies for lung cancer among COPD patients by providing complementary predictive value to conventional clinical assessment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.