ArticleBMC musculoskeletal disorders2026
A comparative study on surgical management of long-course symptomatic cervical OPLL between anterior en bloc resection and posterior laminectomy with instrumented fusion.
Article in BMC musculoskeletal disorders, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe optimal surgical strategy for patients with long-course symptomatic cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) remains controversial.
methodsFrom January 2012 to August 2021, a single-center retrospective cohort study was conducted to compare anterior cervical OPLL en bloc resection (ACOE) versus posterior laminectomy with instrumented fusion (PLF) in patients with long-course symptomatic cervical OPLL. All patients were followed for 48 months postoperatively. The primary endpoint was postoperative Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and the secondary endpoints were the JOA recovery rate (JOA-RR), Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) of neck pain, and complications. Analyses used ANCOVA adjusted for preoperative JOA with overlap (ATO) weighting. Prespecified subgroups were defined by the canal occupying ratio (COR), K-line, OPLL index (OP-index), OPLL morphology, and operated levels. Sensitivity analyses included IPTW (ATE) and restriction sets.
resultsA total of 112 patients were analyzed (64 in ACOE, 48 in PLF). Operative metrics favored ACOE with fewer fused levels, shorter operative time and less blood loss. Primary weighted analysis showed that postoperative JOA in ACOE group was higher than that in PLF group, with an adjusted mean difference of 1.68 calculated as ACOE minus PLF (95% CI, 0.15–3.22; P = 0.033). There was no significant difference in JOA-RR and VAS between the two groups. Overall complication rates were low and comparable between the two groups. Cerebrospinal fluid leak occurred more frequently after ACOE, with wide confidence intervals. Treatment effects were directionally consistent across prespecified subgroups without significant interaction, and sensitivity analysis supported the primary findings.
conclusionsIn long-course symptomatic cervical OPLL, ACOE provided a modest but clinically meaningful improvement in neurological recovery at 48 months compared with PLF, with low and broadly similar complication rates. ACOE may be more preferrable when maximizing neurological recovery is the priority, particularly in patients with high COR or K-line negativity, while posterior strategies remain reasonable for extensive continuous multilevel OPLL. Prospective studies are warranted to verify these findings and conclusions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.