ArticleTurkish journal of surgery2026
From science fiction to operating room: Representations of surgery and AI in film and their ethical implications.
Article in Turkish journal of surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This paper examines the intricate relationship between surgical practice, artificial intelligence (AI), and science fiction movies, focusing on how imaginative storytelling has foreshadowed and influenced the development of modern medical technologies. Tracing the timeline from the Industrial Revolution to the digital era, it discusses key advancements such as robotic-assisted operations, virtual reality-based surgical education, augmented reality applications, and telehealth services. The analysis draws on well-known films-including Prometheus, 2001: A Space Odyssey, Star Wars, and Fantastic Voyage-to examine how cinema has portrayed autonomous surgical tools, ethical challenges, and the evolving interaction between humans and machines. These fictional examples are compared with real-world innovations like the Da Vinci robotic system, mobile messaging for remote consultations, and AI-driven diagnostic methods. The article also addresses broader cultural shifts, including the rise of patient-focused care, greater inclusion of women in surgical roles, and the prioritization of empathy and ethical reasoning in clinical practice. Ultimately, the study asserts that while technology continues to transform surgery, the human touch remains essential. A harmonious integration of advanced tools and compassionate care is necessary to sustain the ethical and humane foundations of surgical medicine.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.