ReviewJournal of multidisciplinary healthcare2026
Artificial Intelligence-Enabled Multi-Omics for Predicting Immune Checkpoint Inhibitor Response and Resistance.
Review in Journal of multidisciplinary healthcare, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Integrating multi-omics data for next-generation cancer research and precision medicine.Clinical & translational oncology : official publication of the Federation of Spanish Oncology Societies and of the National Cancer Institute of Mexico · 2026Review
- Bioinks in systems biology: integrating biomaterial design with cellular network modelling for predictive biofabrication.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Microbiome dysbiosis and its modulation in cancer development, prevention and therapy.Frontiers in oncology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have reshaped oncology, yet overall response rates remain modest and resistance is common, driven by tumor heterogeneity and evolving tumor-immune crosstalk. Established biomarkers (PD-L1, tumor mutational burden, microsatellite instability) provide incomplete prediction. Multi-omics profiling across genomic, transcriptomic, proteomic, epigenomic, metabolomic and microbiomic layers offers a systems-level view of malignant and immune states, uncovering determinants of ICI efficacy such as lineage plasticity, stromal remodeling, immunometabolic reprogramming and microbiome-associated immune modulation. Artificial intelligence (AI) is uniquely positioned to fuse these heterogeneous data, learn non-linear cross-layer signatures, and enable interpretable predictions using approaches such as SHAP and Grad-CAM. Representative models link routine histology or imaging to molecular phenotypes, stratify patients beyond single biomarkers, and may nominate rational combinations that target oncogenic pathways, lactate-driven immune suppression, or the gut microbiome. In this narrative review, we synthesize recent AI-multi-omics advances for response modeling, immune-relevant tumor subtyping, and clinical translation, including radiomics/pathomics integration and liquid-biopsy-based monitoring, as well as emerging applications in toxicity risk prediction. We also discuss barriers to implementation-platform heterogeneity, limited prospective validation, bias, interpretability and cost-and outline future directions, including single-cell and spatial multi-omics integration, federated learning and generative modeling to improve robustness and equity of precision immunotherapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.