ArticleNoro psikiyatri arsivi2026
Assessment of Head Awareness in Patients with Chronic Migraine Using the Fremantle Headache Awareness Questionnaire: Turkish Version, Validity, and Reliability Study.
Article in Noro psikiyatri arsivi, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07567300 (From Mechanisms to Clinical Evidence), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
From Mechanisms to Clinical Evidence: A Cross-Sectional Study of Common Pain Mechanisms in Migraine, Migraine-Related Neck Pain, and Lower Back Pain
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Common Mechanisms in Migraine, Migraine-Related Neck Pain, and Low Back Pain: Implications for Treatment.Pain and therapy · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: In chronic migraine (CM), patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are important, as headaches may be related to impaired proprioception and somatic bodily awareness in the chronicity. This study aimed to adapt the Fremantle Headache Awareness Questionnaire (FreHAQ) to Turkish. Methods: Patients aged 18-70 were included in the study. After cross-cultural adaptation of the questionnaire, demographic-clinical information was recorded. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS), Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6), Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS), Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) and FreHAQ were evaluated for structural validity. Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA) and Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) were also performed. Intraclass Correlation Coefficient (ICC) and Cronbach's α values were calculated for reliability. Results: A total of 180 patients (mean age was 39.94±13.14 years) were included. Headache attacks occurred 17.12±4.53days/month, with 7.57±2.1 intensity. Item-total correlations ranged from 0.079 to 0.673. Cronbach's α value was above 0.811. FreHAQ had good test-retest reliability (ICC=0.851, n=73) and high internal consistency (Cronbach's α=0.919). The absence of a significant difference between baseline and retest scores (p=0.06) supported the temporal stability of FreHAQ. FreHAQ correlated with NPRS, MIDAS, HIT-6, HADS, and PCS (p<0.01). EFA identified a two-factor structure, explaining 56.98% of the variance (proprioceptive-motor awareness (items 1-6,9) and shape-size awareness of the head (items 7,8)). CFA showed acceptable model fit. Conclusion: The Turkish version of FreHAQ is a valid and reliable tool to assess perceptual impairments in CM and is significantly associated with psychosocial factors. Monitoring body awareness in chronic headache can be important for PROMs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.