ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2026
Sutureless Amniotic Membrane Grafting in the Management of Corneal Perforations Associated with Severe Ocular Surface Disease.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: To assess the safety and clinical outcomes of sutureless amniotic membrane (AM) transplantation in patients with small corneal perforations associated with severe ocular surface disease. Patients and Methods: This prospective observational study included 50 eyes of 50 patients with autoimmune or inflammatory ocular surface disease presenting with corneal perforations ≤3 mm. Under topical anesthesia, a double-layer AM was applied without sutures: one layer as a graft directly over the perforation and a second as a patch. A therapeutic contact lens and temporary eyelid closure were used; no topical medications were prescribed, while oral doxycycline (100 mg twice daily) was given for 15 days. Patients were examined at 1 week, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, and 6 months. Primary outcomes were anatomical closure and corneal thinnest point (swept-source OCT). Secondary outcomes included complications and need for further surgery. Results: Complete anatomical closure was achieved in all cases (100%), with a mean healing time of 14.2 ± 3.6 days (range 9-21). Corneal thinnest point increased significantly from 215 ± 38 µm at baseline to 402 ± 39 µm at 6 months (p = 0.000031, repeated-measures ANOVA). No cases of AM displacement, secondary infection, intraocular complications, or re-intervention were observed. The procedure was well tolerated in all patients. Conclusion: Sutureless AM transplantation is a safe, minimally invasive, and effective option for managing ≤3 mm non-infectious corneal perforations in severe ocular surface disease. It enables rapid anatomical restoration, avoids suture-related inflammation, and may be particularly advantageous in fragile or immunocompromised patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.