Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41778189›Full record

ReviewEcancermedicalscience2025

Favourable outcomes of extraskeletal Ewing sarcoma treated on a non-dense chemotherapy backbone with inclusion of radiotherapy for local control.

Aditi Dwivedi, Badira Cheriyalinkal Parambil, Venkata Rama Mohan Gollamudi, Maya Prasad, Siddhartha Laskar, Nehal Khanna, Jifmi Jose Manjali, Ajay Puri, Sajid Qureshi, Prakash Nayak and 7 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Ecancermedicalscience, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Aditi DwivediDivision of Paediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Badira Cheriyalinkal ParambilDivision of Paediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Venkata Rama Mohan GollamudiDivision of Paediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Maya PrasadDivision of Paediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Siddhartha LaskarDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Nehal KhannaDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Jifmi Jose ManjaliDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Ajay PuriDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Sajid QureshiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Prakash NayakDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Manish PruthiDepartment of Surgical Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Sneha ShahDepartment of Nuclear Medicine, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Mukta RamadwarDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Poonam PanjwaniDepartment of Pathology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Vasundara PatelDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Akshay BahetiDepartment of Radiodiagnosis, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.
Girish ChinnaswamyDivision of Paediatric Oncology, Tata Memorial Centre, Homi Bhabha National Institute, Mumbai 400012, India.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Extra skeletal Ewing sarcoma (EES) has less clearly defined clinical behaviour and treatment strategies. We report the clinical profile, outcomes and prognostic factors of children with EES treated at a single centre over a decade on a non-dose chemotherapy backbone. Materials and methods: Children ≤15 years of age with EES treated from January 2012 to December 2021 were retrospectively analysed. All received EFT-2001, a non-dose chemotherapy protocol. Local therapy was planned after 9-12 weeks of chemotherapy. Results: One hundred and six patients formed the study cohort. The majority of the primary was axial in location. Metastasis was present in 25.5%, mainly in the lungs. Local therapy was definitive radiotherapy in 59.1% ( Conclusions: Survival of children with EES treated on a strategy based on non-dose dense chemotherapy with inclusion of radiotherapy as local control modality is comparable to the Western cohorts, especially in the localised setting. Timely delivery of local therapy is imperative for optimal outcomes.

Indexed as

Ewing sarcomaextra skeletaloutcomesradiotherapysurgery

Identifiers

PMID41778189
PMCPMC12950880

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.