SynthesisEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes2026
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction: a systematic review of clinical practice guidelines and recommendations.
Synthesis in European heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Review
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) accounts for over half of heart failure cases and its management is directed by international clinical practice guidelines. To evaluate current recommendations, we conducted a systematic review of guidelines on the diagnosis and management of HFrEF in adults. MEDLINE and EMBASE were searched on 10 November 2024 for publications within the past decade, and websites of relevant medical societies were reviewed. Twelve guidelines were identified, of which seven met predefined AGREE II criteria for methodological 'rigour of development' and were included in the final analysis. Across the selected guidelines, there was broad consensus on the prevention of heart failure, the definition of HFrEF, and the initial diagnostic approach. Recommended investigations included coronary CT angiography, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and invasive coronary angiography in selected patients. There was also agreement on the principles of pharmacological management, with consistent endorsement of foundational therapies such as renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors, beta-blockers, mineralocorticoid receptor antagonists, and sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors. However, key differences emerged regarding thresholds for serum natriuretic peptides, sequencing of RAAS inhibitors, and device-based therapies including implantable defibrillators in non-ischaemic HFrEF, cardiac resynchronization therapy, and indications for coronary revascularization. Variability was also noted in staging, particularly the identification and management of stage A (at-risk) and stage B (pre-heart failure). Only a minority of guidelines addressed common comorbidities such as iron deficiency, atrial fibrillation, obesity, sleep-disordered breathing, and frailty. Our findings underscore the need for greater harmonization to standardize and optimize HFrEF care worldwide.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.