Evidence mapPaperPMID 41779041Full record

ArticleBrain structure & function2026

[

Leticia Verdugo-Díaz, Antonieta Martínez-Guerrero, Diana Cecilia García-García, Arturo Avedaño-Estrada, Miguel Ángel Ávila-Rodríguez, Daniel Garzón-Cortés, Mónica Martínez-Marcial, Valeria Canuto-Ramírez, Gabriel Roldán-Roldán, Elizabeth Ibarra-Coronado

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain structure & function, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Leticia Verdugo-DíazLaboratorio de Bioelectromagnetismo, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México.
Antonieta Martínez-GuerreroLaboratorio de Sistemas Complejos, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México.
Diana Cecilia García-GarcíaLaboratorio de Bioelectromagnetismo, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México.
Arturo Avedaño-EstradaDivisión de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Unidad Radiofarmacia-Ciclotrón, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México.
Miguel Ángel Ávila-RodríguezDivisión de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina, Unidad Radiofarmacia-Ciclotrón, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México.
Daniel Garzón-CortésUnidad de Modelos Biológicos, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México.
Mónica Martínez-MarcialUnidad de Modelos Biológicos, Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México.
Valeria Canuto-RamírezLaboratorio de Bioelectromagnetismo, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México.
Gabriel Roldán-RoldánLaboratorio de Neurobiología Conductual, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México.
Elizabeth Ibarra-CoronadoLaboratorio de Bioelectromagnetismo, Departamento de Fisiología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ciudad de Mexico, México. elizabeth.ibarra@c3.unam.mx.

Funding

CONACyT (the National Council of Science and Technology) CONACYT / PEI 2011 / PROINNOVA / 157118
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Autism spectrum disorder (ASD) is associated with atypical brain network organization. Functional connectivity has been extensively studied using fMRI, which often reports reduced long-range connectivity alongside local hyperconnectivity. However, BOLD-based connectivity reflects neurovascular coupling and therefore provides an indirect estimate of neuronal activity. Complementary information may be obtained from [18F]FDG microPET, which quantifies regional glucose uptake—an index of synaptic energy demand integrated over minutes—although FDG-derived network organization has been scarcely examined in ASD. Here, “metabolic connectivity” refers to between-subject covariance in regional [18F]FDG uptake (group-level metabolic covariance networks), not within-subject temporal coupling as in BOLD-fMRI functional connectivity. We tested whether the C58/J mouse strain—an ASD-relevant model with social deficits and repetitive behaviors—recapitulates ASD-relevant metabolic network-level alterations. Using [18F]FDG microPET, we constructed ROI-wise metabolic covariance networks by correlating uptake values across animals and compared C58/J mice with C57BL/6 controls. The C58/J network exhibited higher clustering and a more locally cohesive organization than the C57BL/6 network. Nodal degree/edge density was reduced in the olfactory bulb, hippocampus, and hypothalamus. In contrast, the motor-related regions—including the striatum, brainstem, and superior and inferior colliculi—showed a higher degree/denser covariance. These findings suggest that C58/J mice display FDG-derived metabolic covariance network features qualitatively consistent with those reported in ASD FDG-PET studies, supporting this strain as a tool to investigate ASD-relevant pathophysiological mechanisms and to evaluate candidate interventions.

Indexed as

Autism Spectrum DisorderBrainFluorodeoxyglucose F18AnimalsBrain MappingDisease Models, AnimalMaleMiceMice, Inbred C57BLPositron-Emission TomographyRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAutism spectrum disorderBehaviorC/58 J strainMetabolic brain networkPositron emission tomography (PET)

Identifiers

PMID41779041
PMCPMC12960385

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.