ArticleGeroScience2026
Women's reproductive factors predict local brain aging profiles mapped using deep neural networks.
Article in GeroScience, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on magnetic resonance images can estimate global brain age (GBA), which reflects women's neurological disease risk. GBA gap (GBAG), the difference between GBA and chronological age (CA), quantifies excessive global aging; local BAG (LBAG) has not been examined despite allowing voxelwise resolution. Using a novel DNN architecture, we estimate LBAG for 12,284 UK Biobank females with chronological ages (CAs) ranging between 46 and 82 years (y) and quantify how it relates to cognition and women's health variables (CA at menopause, reproductive span, menopausal hormone therapy (HT), contraceptive use (CU), number of births). Women with longer reproductive spans (-0.042/y ≤ β ≤ -0.037/y, p < 0.001) had older CAs at menopause onset (-0.052/y ≤ β ≤ -0.046/y, p < 0.001), more births (-0.230 ≤ β ≤ -0.190 per birth, p < 0.001) and younger brains (more negative LBAGs, younger GBAs); a 1-unit increase in each of these variables reflects an LBAG change of β y. Left temporal lobe effects of CA at menopause onset are strongest (-0.0517 ≤ β ≤ -0.0510, p < 0.001). Cognitive scores are related to LBAGs negatively and most strongly in subcortical and right-hemisphere cortex (-0.021 ≤ β ≤ -0.017 per score unit, p < 0.01). In postmenopausal women, delayed regional brain aging is predicted by longer endogenous hormone exposure indexed by later menopause onset, longer reproductive span, and more births. This research highlights the complex role of women's health factors upon brain aging and related cognitive trajectories.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779067What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.