SynthesisDysphagia2026
Risk Factors for Esophageal Stricturing Status Post Total Laryngectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Synthesis in Dysphagia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Esophageal strictures are a common and morbid complication following total laryngectomy, associated with high recurrence rates and reduced quality of life. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to identify risk factors for stricture formation to inform preventative strategies and guide multidisciplinary decision-making. A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines. Searches of Embase, MEDLINE, and Web of Science identified studies of head and neck cancer patients undergoing total laryngectomy who developed esophageal strictures. The screening and data extraction processes were performed by two independent reviewers. A one-sample meta-analysis for binary outcomes was conducted using a random-effects model with restricted maximum likelihood estimation. The Freeman-Tukey double-arcsine transformation was applied to stabilize variance, and pooled proportions with 95% confidence and prediction intervals were calculated. A meta-regression was used to evaluate study-level covariates. Forty-eight studies (4,919 total laryngectomies, 996 strictures) yielded an overall stricture rate of 20.25%. Prior radiation or chemoradiation was associated with higher stricture rates compared to no radiation (23% vs. 15%, p = 0.029). Laryngopharyngectomy was linked to increased stricture frequency relative to laryngectomy alone (26% vs. 18%, p = 0.017). Hypopharyngeal tumors, advanced nodal disease (N2/N3), and mechanical closure were each associated with higher stricture prevalence (p < 0.01). Tobacco/nicotine use was modestly associated with increased stricture rates (19% vs. 12%, p = 0.042). This analysis identified several clinicopathologic and technical factors associated with post-laryngectomy esophageal strictures. Substantial between-study heterogeneity was observed across analyses, with meta-regression variably explaining this heterogeneity and sensitivity analyses suggesting that a small number of influential studies contributed to variability. While the data from this analysis do not imply causation, consistent associations were observed across multiple studies. Recognition of these patterns may help guide risk counseling, surgical technique selection, and postoperative surveillance, but prospective studies are needed to clarify underlying mechanisms and assess potential interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779178What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.