Evidence mapPaperPMID 41779231Full record

SynthesisQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2026

Effects of nonpharmacological interventions on post-stroke quality of life: a systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Ha-Young Park, Insun Yeom

Abstract readSystematic ReviewMeta-AnalysisReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Ha-Young ParkCollege of Nursing, Kyungbok University, Namyangju, South Korea.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8940-4893
Insun YeomCollege of Nursing, Kyungbok University, 425-33, Gyeongbokdae-ro, Jinjeop-eup, 12051, Namyangju-si, Gyeonggi-do, Republic of Korea. ruthin76@naver.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9914-9486

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeStroke remains a leading cause of long-term disability, with survivors experiencing a substantial decline in their health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Although nonpharmacological interventions (NPIs) are known to improve HRQoL, which modalities are most effective and which design characteristics maximize HRQoL outcomes remains unclear. This compared the effects of different NPI types and identified key design determinants, particularly intervention duration, using meta-regression.

methodsPubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched for relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published in English between January 2000 and July 2025. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RCTs involving adult stroke survivors testing education/self-management, exercise/physical training, or psychological/emotional interventions, with HRQoL measured using validated instruments. Meta-regression analyses examined the influence of intervention type and duration on HRQoL improvement. Study selection, data extraction, and quality assessment (risk of bias 2.0) were performed independently by two reviewers.

resultsThirty-two RCTs were analyzed. NPIs significantly improved HRQoL compared to that in controls. Psychological/emotional interventions showed the greatest effect compared to education/self-management and exercise. Meta-regression identified intervention duration as a critical determinant of effectiveness, with programs lasting ≥ 12 weeks yielding significantly greater HRQoL improvements than shorter interventions.

conclusionsBeyond confirming the overall benefits of NPIs, this study demonstrates that both intervention modality and duration are key design determinants of HRQoL improvement after stroke. These findings provide evidence-based guidance on how nonpharmacological rehabilitation programs should be structured—highlighting the importance of psychosocial components and sustained intervention duration—to maximize quality-of-life outcomes in stroke survivors. REGISTRATION: The protocol for this review was prospectively registered with the Open Science Framework on October 3, 2025 ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/Q8VUD ).

Indexed as

Quality of LifeStrokeStroke RehabilitationHumansRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSurvivorsMeta-analysisNonpharmacological interventionsQuality of lifeStrokeSystematic review

Identifiers

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.