ArticleArchives of gynecology and obstetrics2026
Maternal serum NRF2 at 12 weeks as a biomarker for development of gestation diabetes mellitus.
Article in Archives of gynecology and obstetrics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveThe main aim of this study is to evaluate value of maternal serum nuclear factor erythroid 2-related factor 2 (NRF2) levels at 12 weeks in predicting the development of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) at 24-28 weeks' gestation. Other maternal variables were also evaluated, and their relationships with NRF2 levels were assessed.
methodsWe conducted a single-center prospective cohort study including 1,270 pregnant women who attended their first-trimester antenatal visit between October 2021 and October 2023. At 12 weeks, fasting serum was collected to measure NRF2 by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and thyroid hormones on an automated chemiluminescent platform. Clinical data included age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), blood pressure, fasting plasma glucose, and lipids. All participants underwent a 75-g oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) at 24-28 weeks and GDM was diagnosed by International Association of the Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups (IADPSG) criteria. Spearman correlation assessed associations between NRF2 and clinical variables. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis evaluated discrimination. Multivariable logistic regression identified independent predictors.
resultsAmong 1,270 pregnant women enrolled, 177 (13.9%) developed GDM. At 12 weeks of gestation, women who later developed GDM had significantly lower serum NRF2 levels than those without GDM. They also showed higher fasting plasma glucose (FPG), mean arterial pressure (MAP), as well as lower free thyroxine (FT4) levels. ROC analysis demonstrated that serum NRF2 at 12 weeks had good predictive value for GDM, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.779 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.745-0.812, p < 0.001). A combined model incorporating NRF2 with MAP, FT4, and FPG showed improved discrimination, with an AUC of 0.882 (95% CI 0.856-0.908, p < 0.001). In multivariable logistic regression, lower serum NRF2 (odds ratio [OR] = 0.948, 95% CI 0.938-0.957, p < 0.001), higher MAP (OR = 1.182, 95% CI 1.132-1.233, p < 0.001), higher FPG (OR = 3.911, 95% CI 2.471-6.190, p < 0.001), and lower FT4 (OR = 0.639, 95% CI 0.562-0.726, p < 0.001) were identified as independent predictors of GDM, whereas other baseline parameters were not significant.
conclusionDecreased maternal serum NFR2 levels at 12 weeks' gestation appear to be associated with an increased risk of developing GDM later in pregnancy. Combining this marker, together with FT4, MAP and potentially FPG may serve as a useful first-trimester screening for the risk to develop GDM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.