Evidence mapPaperPMID 41779286Full record

ArticleJournal of patient-reported outcomes2026

Carer and patient experiences in a virtual hospital: service insights from a mixed-methods analysis of reported experience measures.

Kanesha Ward, Tim Jackson, Shannon Saad, Jenna Bartyn, Sue Amanatidis, Sarah White, Shila Poudel, Owen Hutchings, Annie Y S Lau

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of patient-reported outcomes, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Understanding the Role of Patients and Carers in a Virtual Hospital Through Journey Mapping: Multi-Method Triangulation Analysis.Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Kanesha WardCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia. kanesha.ward@mq.edu.au.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2145-3629
Tim JacksonCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.
Shannon SaadSydney Virtual (previously known as rpavirtual), Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0423-5478
Jenna BartynSydney Virtual (previously known as rpavirtual), Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6320-5888
Sue AmanatidisSydney Virtual (previously known as rpavirtual), Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Sarah WhiteSchool of Clinical Medicine - Discipline of General Practice, University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia.
Shila PoudelSydney Virtual (previously known as rpavirtual), Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Owen HutchingsSydney Virtual (previously known as rpavirtual), Sydney Local Health District, Sydney, Australia.
Annie Y S LauCentre for Health Informatics, Australian Institute of Health Innovation, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, 2109, Australia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCarers, including family members and companions, play a crucial role in supporting patients and sharing insights about their care experiences. Their influence is especially important in virtual hospital models, where patients receive remote hospital-level care using digital technologies. However, there is limited evidence examining what carers think about virtual hospitals or how their experiences could be improved. METHODOLOGY: We explored Patient-Reported Experience Measure (PREM) surveys completed by 3047 patients and 235 carers to better understand their experiences with virtual hospitals and suggest insights into how to enhance carer and patient experience from the carer’s perspective. Participants were patients and carers discharged from an acute respiratory model of care within a virtual hospital (from 1st March 2020 to 26th August 2024). We conducted both statistical and qualitative (content) analysis. Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare differences between carer and patient responses to 12 Likert scale questions on their reported experience. Content analysis was applied to two free-text comments (What was the best part of the care you received from the virtual hospital? What part of your care provided by virtual hospital most needs improving?). Keywords from the content analysis of free-text responses were integrated with statistical findings from Likert-scale questions to develop insights.

results3047 patients and 235 carers of PREM surveys were analysed. The overall rating of the virtual hospital service was the same between carer and patients, with the mean response of ‘Excellent’. Our service insights from carers highlight how they support patients, shape their care experience, and offer valuable feedback. We identified six key insights that improve patient and carer experience including reassurance, effective communication, consistent availability, supportive healthcare workers, person-centred clinical service, and usable technology.

conclusionsFindings from this study can highlight ways virtual hospital models can be more inclusive and centred around both patients and carers, using data that is already being collected through routine surveys. Carers such as family members and companions play a vital, but often under-recognised role in care by supporting patients emotionally, practically, and through communication. Their influence is especially important in virtual hospital models, where patients receive remote hospital-level care using digital technologies. However, there is limited evidence examining what carers think about virtual hospitals or how their experiences could be improved. In this study, we have explored patient-reported experience measure surveys completed by 3047 patients and 235 carers to better understand their experiences with a virtual hospital service. This study identified service insights from carers that highlight how they support patients, shape their care experience, and offer valuable feedback. We identified six key insights that improve patient and carer experience including reassurance, effective communication, consistent availability, supportive healthcare workers, person-centred clinical service, and usable technology. Findings from this study can help improve virtual hospital models to be more inclusive and centred around both patients and carers, using data that is already being collected as part of standard care.

Indexed as

CaregiversPatient Reported Outcome MeasuresPatient SatisfactionAdultAgedDigital HealthFemaleHospitalsHumansMaleMiddle AgedQualitative ResearchSurveys and QuestionnairesCarersMixed methodsPatient ExperienceSurveyTelehealthVirtual consultationsVirtual hospital

Identifiers

PMID41779286
PMCPMC13069058

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.