ArticleApplied psychophysiology and biofeedback2026
Task-Based EEG Neurofeedback Enhances Training Effects in Dynamic Visual Search.
Article in Applied psychophysiology and biofeedback, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Dynamic visual search is essential for efficient performance in high-demand perceptual and operational environments. However, effectively improving such a higher-order cognitive ability remains challenging. Although conventional training approaches based on repeated practice can enhance visual search performance, their effectiveness tends to reach a ceiling, thereby constraining further development. To address this limitation, the present study developed a task-based EEG neurofeedback (NF) paradigm by integrating parietal beta upregulation training into the moving object discrimination (MOD) paradigm, a dynamic visual search task. We then conducted well-designed training procedures with 88 healthy participants randomly assigned to the NF group (task-based NF training), the Sham group (sham-feedback training), and the Control group (no training). Results showed that (i) the NF group exhibited significantly greater increases in parietal beta power both within and across training sessions, compared to the Sham group; and (ii) the NF group achieved significantly greater reductions in response time (RT) during the MOD task compared to both the Sham and Control groups. The enhanced training effects likely resulted from the direct modulation of task-relevant neural activity and the promotion of sustained attentional engagement during task execution through parietal beta upregulation. Overall, these findings underscore the utility of task-based NF in facilitating more effective training in cognitively demanding contexts and provide a promising framework for developing high-efficiency, domain-specific training interventions. Nevertheless, the present findings should be interpreted with caution due to the absence of a conventional practice-based training comparison and limited participant diversity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779307What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.