ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
A Gradient-Based Machine-Learning Inspired Inverse Modeling Approach for Characterization of Nonlinear Tissue Properties.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeCharacterization of anisotropic nonlinear material properties along with fiber directions for soft tissues based on known deformations (strains) and external loads is a significant clinical goal.
methodsA gradient-based inverse solver is developed to retrieve anisotropic nonlinear tissue properties. By directly minimizing nodal force residuals using known deformed and reference configurations, the method avoids repeated forward simulations. To represent complex, non-trivial spatial distributions, the material properties are parameterized using a multilayer perceptron (MLP) that maps spatial location to material behavior, in contrast to methods that use such networks to approximate the displacement field itself. For faster convergence, residual smoothing is performed, and the Jacobian computation is parallelized. The framework supports general constitutive laws as demonstrated by Neo-Hookean and Fung-type models.
resultsThe inverse solver is verified for a variety of cases, including spatially varying elasticity and anisotropic fiber distributions, and its applicability to complex 3D geometries is demonstrated on a bioprosthetic heart valve. The residual-only formulation leads to faster optimization iterations compared to Physics-Informed Neural Network (PINN) approaches, which involve computationally expensive updates to a displacement-approximating network. Unlike the Neo-Hookean constitutive model, the Fung model, especially with element-wise recovery of parameters, exhibits nonuniqueness, where different spatial distributions of parameters can yield similar residual levels; in contrast, fiber direction recovery remains robust across all cases.
conclusionThe inverse solver is capable of recovering nonlinear material properties and fiber directions even for complex 3D problems with large deformations such as heart valves.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779313What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.