ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026
Task-dependent reinstatement of irrelevant features from long-term memory into visual working memory templates.
Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objects actively stored in visual working memory (VWM) produce VWM-based attentional capture. Interestingly, for an object's features to be stored in VWM, they do not need to be shown but can also be reinstated from long-term memory (LTM). Unlike shown features, reinstated features in VWM sometimes capture attention even when task-irrelevant, suggesting observers may be able to choose when reinstatement occurs. To investigate the control of LTM reinstatement, we examined how capture by reinstated features is influenced by differences in task demands. Participants memorized objects with specific colors and then completed a dual task in which they were instructed to rapidly identify the location of one of the objects' shapes (speeded object search; Experiments 1a and 2a) or complete a self-paced forced-choice comparison test (unspeeded object recognition; Experiments 1b and 2b), regardless of color. On each trial, one memorized object was brought into VWM, and participants completed a diamond search task and/or an object recognition, or an object search task. The results revealed that under speeded task demands, task-irrelevant features from LTM were reinstated into the VWM template, leading to increased distraction in both the diamond and the object search tasks. However, under unspeeded task demands, the memorized color did not influence search in the diamond search task, but still biased performance in the recognition task (Exp. 2b). These findings suggest that the integration of LTM features into VWM templates is modulated by task demands, indicating some level of control over LTM reinstatement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41779322What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.