Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41779322›Full record

ArticleAttention, perception & psychophysics2026

Task-dependent reinstatement of irrelevant features from long-term memory into visual working memory templates.

Jessica M Kespe, Rory Lippert, Naseem Al-Aidroos

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Attention, perception & psychophysics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Jessica M KespePsychology Department, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada. jkespe@uoguelph.ca.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9955-1464
Rory LippertPsychology Department, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0004-6244-5432
Naseem Al-AidroosPsychology Department, University of Guelph, 50 Stone Road E, Guelph, ON, N1G 2W1, Canada.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7440-752X

Funding

Canada Foundation for Innovation 30374Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 418507-2012Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada 589024-2024
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objects actively stored in visual working memory (VWM) produce VWM-based attentional capture. Interestingly, for an object's features to be stored in VWM, they do not need to be shown but can also be reinstated from long-term memory (LTM). Unlike shown features, reinstated features in VWM sometimes capture attention even when task-irrelevant, suggesting observers may be able to choose when reinstatement occurs. To investigate the control of LTM reinstatement, we examined how capture by reinstated features is influenced by differences in task demands. Participants memorized objects with specific colors and then completed a dual task in which they were instructed to rapidly identify the location of one of the objects' shapes (speeded object search; Experiments 1a and 2a) or complete a self-paced forced-choice comparison test (unspeeded object recognition; Experiments 1b and 2b), regardless of color. On each trial, one memorized object was brought into VWM, and participants completed a diamond search task and/or an object recognition, or an object search task. The results revealed that under speeded task demands, task-irrelevant features from LTM were reinstated into the VWM template, leading to increased distraction in both the diamond and the object search tasks. However, under unspeeded task demands, the memorized color did not influence search in the diamond search task, but still biased performance in the recognition task (Exp. 2b). These findings suggest that the integration of LTM features into VWM templates is modulated by task demands, indicating some level of control over LTM reinstatement.

Indexed as

AttentionMemory, Long-TermMemory, Short-TermPattern Recognition, VisualAdultColor PerceptionDual-Task TestsFemaleHumansMaleProcessing SpeedReaction TimeYoung AdultAttentional TemplatesLong-term Memory (LTM)ReinstatementVisual Working Memory (VWM)

Identifiers

PMID41779322

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.