Evidence mapPaperPMID 41779345Full record

ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2026

Animal models of critical illness in the Asia-Pacific region: current practices, shared challenges, and future directions.

Yoshihisa Fujinami, Shuangqing Liu, Gianluigi Li Bassi, Marcin Osuchowski, Yongming Yao, John Fraser, Shigeaki Inoue

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yoshihisa Fujinami *Department of Emergency Medicine, Kakogawa Central City Hospital, Hyogo, Japan.
Shuangqing Liu *Medical Innovation Research Division and Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Gianluigi Li Bassi *Critical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
Marcin OsuchowskiLudwig Boltzmann Institute for Traumatology, The Research Center in Cooperation With AUVA, Vienna, Austria.
Yongming YaoMedical Innovation Research Division and Fourth Medical Center of the Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
John FraserCritical Care Research Group, The Prince Charles Hospital, Chermside, QLD, Australia.
Shigeaki InoueDepartment of Emergency and Critical Care Medicine, Wakayama Medical University, Wakayama, Japan. caf55000@gmail.com.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3907-8537

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Animal models of critical illness span diverse species and experimental approaches, reflecting the biological complexity of severe disease states while being constrained by animal welfare requirements and country-specific regulatory, infrastructural, and workforce factors. Persistent challenges remain, including limited reproducibility, fragmented standards, and the need for ethical alignment across borders. This review examines these shared structural challenges in critical illness animal research across the Asia-Pacific region. While alternative and complementary methodologies are increasingly incorporated into preclinical research, their adoption remains uneven. We argue that alignment with globally recognized preclinical frameworks, including the 3Rs and disease-specific standards, such as MQTiPSS, is essential. This review discusses actionable strategies-centered on harmonized standards, shared resources, and international collaboration-to strengthen research rigor, support early career researchers, and enhance the translational relevance of critical illness animal research.

Identifiers

PMID41779345
PMCPMC12961032

What Socratic holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.