ReviewIntensive care medicine experimental2026
Animal models of critical illness in the Asia-Pacific region: current practices, shared challenges, and future directions.
Review in Intensive care medicine experimental, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- The 5% Problem: How the Biomedical Community Responded to the Animal-to-Human Translation Crisis, and the Case for Non-Animal Methods.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Animal models of critical illness span diverse species and experimental approaches, reflecting the biological complexity of severe disease states while being constrained by animal welfare requirements and country-specific regulatory, infrastructural, and workforce factors. Persistent challenges remain, including limited reproducibility, fragmented standards, and the need for ethical alignment across borders. This review examines these shared structural challenges in critical illness animal research across the Asia-Pacific region. While alternative and complementary methodologies are increasingly incorporated into preclinical research, their adoption remains uneven. We argue that alignment with globally recognized preclinical frameworks, including the 3Rs and disease-specific standards, such as MQTiPSS, is essential. This review discusses actionable strategies-centered on harmonized standards, shared resources, and international collaboration-to strengthen research rigor, support early career researchers, and enhance the translational relevance of critical illness animal research.
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.