Trial reportJAMA2026
A Decision-Support System to Personalize Antidepressant Treatment in Major Depressive Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial.
Trial report in JAMA, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05608330 (Personalise Antidepressant Treatment for Unipolar Depression Combining Individual Choices, Risks and Big Data), which is not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Personalise Antidepressant Treatment for Unipolar Depression Combining Individual Choices, Risks and Big Data
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Current themes of AI in mental health: Actionable evidence and guardrails for mood and anxiety care.Journal of mood and anxiety disorders · 2026Review
- [Therapist augmentation by generative AI: concept and implementation of the GAINED feedback system at Osnabrück University].Psychotherapie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
31 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Importance: Antidepressants for moderate to severe major depressive disorder may be discontinued prematurely because the prescribed antidepressant is not always the most appropriate medication for an individual. Guidelines have recommended more precise targeting of antidepressant treatment. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy of a web-based tool to personalize antidepressant treatment. Design, Setting, and Participants: This multicenter, randomized clinical trial included persons between the ages of 18 and 74 years with major depressive disorder. The trial was conducted at 47 sites in 3 countries (Brazil, Canada, and the UK). The first participant was screened on November 29, 2022, and the last follow-up visit occurred on January 15, 2025. Intervention: A total of 540 participants were randomized (1:1) to an evidence-based clinical decision-support system (PETRUSHKA tool; n = 271) or usual care (n = 269). Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was treatment discontinuation due to any cause at 8 weeks. The secondary outcomes included treatment discontinuation up to 24 weeks due to adverse events and changes in depressive symptoms (measured with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire [PHQ-9]; range, 0-27; higher scores indicate more severe depression) and anxiety symptoms (measured with the 7-item Generalized Anxiety Disorder [GAD-7] questionnaire; range, 0-21; higher scores indicate more severe symptoms). Results: Of the 520 eligible participants, 493 were included in the primary analysis (median age, 35 [IQR, 25 to 48] years; 58% female; PHQ-9 mean score, 16.6 [SD, 5.1]; GAD-7 mean score, 11.5 [SD, 4.1]). At 8 weeks, 41 of 241 participants (17%) in the PETRUSHKA group discontinued the prescribed antidepressant due to any cause vs 69 of 252 (27%) in the usual care group (adjusted relative risk, 0.62 [95% CI, 0.44 to 0.88]; P = .007). At 8 weeks, 22 of 241 participants (9%) in the PETRUSHKA group discontinued the prescribed antidepressant due to adverse events vs 39 of 252 (16%) in the usual care group (adjusted relative risk, 0.59 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.97]; P = .04). For the assessment of depressive symptoms at 24 weeks, the mean PHQ-9 score was 7.1 (SD, 5.4) in the PETRUSHKA group vs 9.2 (SD, 6.5) in the usual care group (n = 129 in each group; adjusted between-group mean difference, -1.92 [95% CI, -3.06 to -0.78]; P < .001). For the assessment of anxiety symptoms at 24 weeks, the mean GAD-7 score was 4.6 (SD, 4.1) in the PETRUSHKA group (n = 133) vs 5.8 (SD, 4.9) in the usual care group (n = 126) (adjusted between-group mean difference, -1.39 [95% CI, -2.26 to -0.52]; P = .002). Conclusions and Relevance: Compared with usual care, use of the PETRUSHKA tool increased the number of patients still taking their antidepressant at 8 weeks and improved depressive and anxiety symptoms at 24 weeks. However, lack of a double-blind design and the large amount of missing data limit the validity of these results. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT05608330.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What Socratic holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the Socratic graph.